Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougSF30 who wrote (197386)	5/17/2006 7:35:10 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Doug re: So "soon" means a quarter or two. LOL, and if you believe that would you be interested in buying brooklyn bridge - really great deal, I tell you re: Containing costs sounds great As opposed to wasting money as he did prior to that re: Seems sensible-- judge the guy on how NGMA does so what if he wasted billions of shareholder's money. He thinks that he was punished enough by not making more on his options. BTW I think he gained on his options due to lower strikes...... -AK

To: dougSF30 who wrote (197386)	5/17/2006 9:36:51 PM
From: Joe NYC	Respond to of 275872

Doug, 1)"The financial community's attitude toward Santa Clara, California-based Intel's share price won't change until it regains market share lost to rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc., said Otellini, 55, who promised to make that happen this year." It seems to me that Intel is concerned more about market share than profitability. Theoretically, both can happen at the same time, but it seems Intel is concentrating on market share. Doe that mean that he is signaling that profitability may not improve? Or is he saying that he wants Intel to be judged by market share near term, not profitability... Joe