SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (288385)5/18/2006 12:29:46 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1571686
 
Since it's been ignored too long...if the police were to clean up L.A. it would probably come to that.

Many on this thread probably think you are exaggerating. In reality, you are very close to the truth. If people in this country knew how bad LA is, they would be afraid, very afraid. Since the riots, they have gussied it up all pretty but underneath its the same old cancer temporarily in remission.




To: Jim McMannis who wrote (288385)5/18/2006 12:30:47 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1571686
 
Bush turns to big military contractors to gain control of U.S. borders

By Eric Lipton The New York Times

THURSDAY, MAY 18, 2006


WASHINGTON The quick fix may involve sending in the National Guard. But to really patch up the broken border, President George W. Bush is preparing to turn to a familiar administration partner: giant military contractors.

Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman, three of the largest, are among the companies that said they would submit bids within two weeks for a multibillion-dollar contract to build what the administration calls a "virtual fence" along the U.S. borders.

Using some of the same high-priced, high-tech tools these companies have already put to work in Iraq and Afghanistan - like unmanned aerial vehicles, ground surveillance satellites and motion-detection video equipment - the defense contractors are zeroing the long borders that separate Mexico and Canada from the United States.

It is a humbling acknowledgment that despite more than a decade of initiatives with macho-sounding names, like Operation Hold the Line in El Paso or Operation Gate Keeper in San Diego, the U.S. government has repeatedly failed on its own to gain control of the borders.

The Bush administration intends to not simply buy high-tech equipment to help it patrol the borders - a tactic it has also already tried, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars, with extremely limited success. It is also asking the contractors to devise and build a whole new border strategy.

"This is an unusual invitation," Michael Jackson, the deputy secretary of homeland security, told contractors this year at an industry briefing, just before the bidding period for this new contract started. "We're asking you to come back and tell us how to do our business."

The effort comes as the Senate voted Wednesday to add hundreds of miles of fencing along the border with Mexico. The measure would also prohibit illegal immigrants convicted of a felony or three misdemeanors from any chance at citizenship.

The high-tech plan has many skeptics.

"We've been presented with expensive proposals for elaborate border technology that eventually have proven to be ineffective and wasteful," said Representative Harold Rogers, Republican of Kentucky, at a hearing on the Secure Border Initiative last month. "How is the SBI not just another three-letter acronym for failure?"

But Bush said he was convinced that the government can succeed this time.

"We are launching the most technologically advanced border security initiative in American history," Bush said in his speech Monday.

Under the plan, the Department of Homeland Security and its Customs and Border Protection division will still be charged with patrolling the 6,000 miles, or 10,000 kilometers, of borders.

But the equipment these Border Patrol agents use, how and when they are dispatched to spots along the border, where the agents assemble the captured immigrants, how they process them and transport them - all of these steps will now be scripted by the winning contractor. The winner could earn an estimated $2 billion over the next three to six years.

More Border Patrol agents are part of the answer: The Bush administration has committed to increasing the force to about 18,500 from 11,500 by the time the president leaves office in 2008. But simply spreading this army of agents out evenly along the border or extending fences in and around urban areas is not sufficient, officials said.

"Boots on the ground is not really enough," Michael Chertoff, the homeland security secretary, said Tuesday of Bush's plan to send as many as 6,000 National Guard troops.

The tools of modern warfare must be brought to bear: devices like the Tethered Aerostat Radar, a helium- filled airship made for the air force by Lockheed Martin that is twice the size of the Goodyear Blimp. Attached to the ground by a cable, the airship can hover overhead and automatically monitor any movement, during night or day. (One downside: it cannot operate in high winds.)

Northrop Grumman is considering offering its Global Hawk, an unmanned aerial vehicle with a wingspan nearly as wide as a Boeing 737, that can snoop on movement along the border. Closer to earth, Northrop might deploy a fleet of much smaller, unmanned planes that could be launched from a truck, flying perhaps just above a group of already detected immigrants so it would be harder for them to scatter.

Each of these giant contractors is teaming up with dozens of smaller companies that will provide everything from the automated cameras to backup energy supplies to keep this equipment running in the desert.

At least five so-called system integrators - Lockheed, Raytheon, Northrop, as well as Boeing and Ericsson - are expected to submit bids. The winner, due to be selected before October, will not be given a specific dollar commitment. Instead, each package of equipment and management solutions will be evaluated and bought individually.

"We're not just going to say, 'Oh, this looks like some neat stuff, let's buy it and then put it on the border,'" Chertoff said.

There is still skepticism, however. A total of $101 million is already available for the program. But on Wednesday, when the House Appropriations Committee moved to approve the Homeland Security Department's proposed $32.1 billion budget for 2007, it proposed withholding $25 million of $115 million allocated next year for the Secure Border contracting effort until the administration better defined its plans.

Rove meets House group

With conservatives in revolt over a proposal that would allow some illegal aliens to qualify for residency, the White House dispatched Karl Rove, the president's political adviser, to a meeting of House Republicans to make the case for the president's immigration plans, The New York Times reported from Washington.

House members said that Rove made little headway and that most Republicans remained adamantly opposed to any plan that leads to citizenship for those unlawfully in the United States.

WASHINGTON The quick fix may involve sending in the National Guard. But to really patch up the broken border, President George W. Bush is preparing to turn to a familiar administration partner: giant military contractors.

Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman, three of the largest, are among the companies that said they would submit bids within two weeks for a multibillion-dollar contract to build what the administration calls a "virtual fence" along the U.S. borders.

Using some of the same high-priced, high-tech tools these companies have already put to work in Iraq and Afghanistan - like unmanned aerial vehicles, ground surveillance satellites and motion-detection video equipment - the defense contractors are zeroing the long borders that separate Mexico and Canada from the United States.

It is a humbling acknowledgment that despite more than a decade of initiatives with macho-sounding names, like Operation Hold the Line in El Paso or Operation Gate Keeper in San Diego, the U.S. government has repeatedly failed on its own to gain control of the borders.

The Bush administration intends to not simply buy high-tech equipment to help it patrol the borders - a tactic it has also already tried, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars, with extremely limited success. It is also asking the contractors to devise and build a whole new border strategy.

"This is an unusual invitation," Michael Jackson, the deputy secretary of homeland security, told contractors this year at an industry briefing, just before the bidding period for this new contract started. "We're asking you to come back and tell us how to do our business."

The effort comes as the Senate voted Wednesday to add hundreds of miles of fencing along the border with Mexico. The measure would also prohibit illegal immigrants convicted of a felony or three misdemeanors from any chance at citizenship.

The high-tech plan has many skeptics.

"We've been presented with expensive proposals for elaborate border technology that eventually have proven to be ineffective and wasteful," said Representative Harold Rogers, Republican of Kentucky, at a hearing on the Secure Border Initiative last month. "How is the SBI not just another three-letter acronym for failure?"

But Bush said he was convinced that the government can succeed this time.

"We are launching the most technologically advanced border security initiative in American history," Bush said in his speech Monday.

Under the plan, the Department of Homeland Security and its Customs and Border Protection division will still be charged with patrolling the 6,000 miles, or 10,000 kilometers, of borders.

But the equipment these Border Patrol agents use, how and when they are dispatched to spots along the border, where the agents assemble the captured immigrants, how they process them and transport them - all of these steps will now be scripted by the winning contractor. The winner could earn an estimated $2 billion over the next three to six years.

More Border Patrol agents are part of the answer: The Bush administration has committed to increasing the force to about 18,500 from 11,500 by the time the president leaves office in 2008. But simply spreading this army of agents out evenly along the border or extending fences in and around urban areas is not sufficient, officials said.

"Boots on the ground is not really enough," Michael Chertoff, the homeland security secretary, said Tuesday of Bush's plan to send as many as 6,000 National Guard troops.

The tools of modern warfare must be brought to bear: devices like the Tethered Aerostat Radar, a helium- filled airship made for the air force by Lockheed Martin that is twice the size of the Goodyear Blimp. Attached to the ground by a cable, the airship can hover overhead and automatically monitor any movement, during night or day. (One downside: it cannot operate in high winds.)

Northrop Grumman is considering offering its Global Hawk, an unmanned aerial vehicle with a wingspan nearly as wide as a Boeing 737, that can snoop on movement along the border. Closer to earth, Northrop might deploy a fleet of much smaller, unmanned planes that could be launched from a truck, flying perhaps just above a group of already detected immigrants so it would be harder for them to scatter.

Each of these giant contractors is teaming up with dozens of smaller companies that will provide everything from the automated cameras to backup energy supplies to keep this equipment running in the desert.

At least five so-called system integrators - Lockheed, Raytheon, Northrop, as well as Boeing and Ericsson - are expected to submit bids. The winner, due to be selected before October, will not be given a specific dollar commitment. Instead, each package of equipment and management solutions will be evaluated and bought individually.

"We're not just going to say, 'Oh, this looks like some neat stuff, let's buy it and then put it on the border,'" Chertoff said.

There is still skepticism, however. A total of $101 million is already available for the program. But on Wednesday, when the House Appropriations Committee moved to approve the Homeland Security Department's proposed $32.1 billion budget for 2007, it proposed withholding $25 million of $115 million allocated next year for the Secure Border contracting effort until the administration better defined its plans.

Rove meets House group

With conservatives in revolt over a proposal that would allow some illegal aliens to qualify for residency, the White House dispatched Karl Rove, the president's political adviser, to a meeting of House Republicans to make the case for the president's immigration plans, The New York Times reported from Washington.

House members said that Rove made little headway and that most Republicans remained adamantly opposed to any plan that leads to citizenship for those unlawfully in the United States.


iht.com



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (288385)5/18/2006 12:50:30 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571686
 
A Job Americans Won't Do, Even at $34 an Hour

latimes.com

Some landscape firms rebut claims that higher pay, not immigration reform, is needed.
By David Streitfeld, Times Staff Writer
May 18, 2006

Cyndi Smallwood is looking for a few strong men for her landscaping company. Guys with no fear of a hot sun, who can shovel dirt all day long. She'll pay as much as $34 an hour.

She can't find them.

...



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (288385)5/19/2006 6:48:37 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571686
 
Coming Down to Earth
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Um, wasn't the stock market supposed to bounce back after Wednesday's big drop?

We shouldn't read too much into a couple of days' movements in stock prices. But it seems that investors are suddenly feeling uneasy about the state of the economy. They should be; the puzzle is why they haven't been uneasy all along.

The rise in stock prices that began last fall was essentially based on the belief that the U.S. economy can defy gravity — that both individuals and the nation as a whole can spend more than their income, not on a temporary basis, but more or less indefinitely.

To be fair, for a while the data seemed to confirm that belief. In 2005, the trade deficit passed $700 billion, yet the dollar actually rose against the euro and the yen. Housing prices soared, yet houses kept selling. The price of gasoline neared $3 a gallon, yet consumers kept buying both gas and other items, even though they had to borrow to keep spending (the personal savings rate went negative for the first time since the 1930's).

Over the last few weeks, however, gravity seems to have started reasserting itself.

The dollar began falling about a month ago. So far it's down less than 10 percent against the euro and the yen, but there's a definite sense that foreign governments, in particular, are becoming less willing to keep the dollar strong by buying lots of U.S. debt.

The housing market seems to be weakening rapidly. As late as last October, the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo housing market index, a measure of builders' confidence, was still close to the high point it reached last summer. But on Monday the association announced that the index had fallen to its lowest level since 1995.

Finally, there are preliminary indications that consumers, hard-pressed by high gasoline prices, may be reaching their limit.

The National Retail Federation, reporting on a new survey, warns that "while consumers have seemed resilient in the face of higher energy costs, a tipping point may soon be in sight."

I can't resist pointing out that the Bush administration's response to the squeeze on working families has been, you guessed it, to accuse the news media of biased reporting.

On May 10 the White House issued a press release titled "Setting the Record Straight: The New York Times Continues to Ignore America's Economic Progress." The release attacked The Times for asserting that paychecks weren't keeping up with fixed costs like medical care and gasoline. The White House declared, "But average hourly earnings have risen 3.8 percent over the past 12 months, their largest increase in nearly five years."

On Wednesday Treasury Secretary John Snow repeated that boast before a House committee. However, Representative Barney Frank was ready. He asked whether the number was adjusted for inflation; after flailing about, Mr. Snow admitted, sheepishly, that it wasn't. In fact, nearly all of the wage increase was negated by higher prices.

Meanwhile, the return of economic gravity poses a definite threat to U.S. economic growth. After all, growth over the past three years was driven mainly by a housing boom and rapid growth in consumer spending. People were able to buy houses, even though housing prices rose much faster than incomes, because foreign purchases of U.S. debt kept interest rates low. People were able to keep spending, even though wages didn't keep up with inflation, because mortgage refinancing let them turn the rising value of their houses into ready cash.

As I summarized it awhile back, we became a nation in which people make a living by selling one another houses, and they pay for the houses with money borrowed from China.

Now that game seems to be coming to an end. We're going to have to find other ways to make a living — in particular, we're going to have to start selling goods and services, not just I.O.U.'s, to the rest of the world, and/or replace imports with domestic production. And adjusting to that new way of making a living will take time.

Will we have that time? Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, contends that what's happening in the housing market is "a very orderly and moderate kind of cooling." Maybe he's right. But if he isn't, the stock market drop of the last two days will be remembered as the start of a serious economic slowdown.