Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Webster Groves who wrote (51441)	5/18/2006 12:20:15 AM
From: mishedlo	Respond to of 116555

I do not think you can tell jack shit from that video. That is probably the point of it too. It keeps stupid conspiracy theories alive. Mish

To: Webster Groves who wrote (51441)	5/18/2006 12:50:08 AM
From: Square_Dealings	Respond to of 116555

yeah thats it!, someone made that video just to start conspiracy theories since of course you cant tell exactly how it came down then to question it is stupid return to your station immediately and maintain the status quo the decider has spoken thx s

To: Webster Groves who wrote (51441)	5/18/2006 2:18:28 AM
From: bela_ghoulashi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116555

Nice try, but bs. The collapse of WT-7 was the result of structural damage sustained from two of the most massive buildings on the face of the earth collapsing in its immediate vicinity. It wasn't hit by a plane, there was no fire on its upper stories. WT-7 didn't collapse for the same reasons that the towers collapsed, the cause was not the same, so there is no reason to expect it would collapse in the same way. How WT-7 collapsed has no bearing whatever on how the towers themselves collapsed. The towers collapsed from the top down. Sorry, but you lose.