SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hans de Vries who wrote (197426)5/18/2006 2:08:02 AM
From: dougSF30Respond to of 275872
 
That's very interesting. So Rev D was actually 100nm, and Rev E was really 90nm?

But then, (90/130)^2 * 193 = 92, not 106... so they are still closer to 100nm?

106/193 works out to 96nm process, assuming everything is perfect.

But you earlier mentioned that some I/O portions of the die don't scale nearly as well, so that must impact things too.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News