Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rollocaster who wrote (11540)	5/18/2006 10:57:13 AM
From: Zincman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78412

<<Airborne! Once is enough.>> Never- Bite your typing finger... I've got 2000 free falls under my belt.. Would do 2000 more if I could find my damn parachute.... ;)

To: Rollocaster who wrote (11540)	5/18/2006 1:54:52 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78412

Hi Lester, I was just worried about the DOW dragging down everything and the Nikkie was hitting new lows. I saw it in 1987. The dollar was up because people are selling bonds and stocks and going into cash. I think we are just in a pause stage, but I do not want to just sit and watch my gains disappear. There will be time to get back in. I still have 50% in the mining stocks. I will gladly pay the premium and get back in after I am sure we can go above old highs. And there has been so much technical damage, I should not have to pay a huge premium. I mostly sold all my wts as I felt they were overvalued in comparison to the stock price. I do expect the dollar to decline precipitously (at least 30% in next year). It could collapse. I loved this: Rollo May, havn't heard that ame for awahile-lol. "Like Rollo May writes: A theory, no matter how logical and perfect, may be intellectually sound and infallible but is it existentially real??? I should send this to Hommel (joke)" I always said: something can be logical and wrong e.g. Lamarkain evolution is logical but wrong, as compared to Darwinian evolution. However we may find that at the quantum level there is something Lamarkin-lol. I will look for stuff when I see where and how to re enter. Cheers,