Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (8712)	5/18/2006 3:54:51 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Avoiding the issue? The issue from the beginning was that Clinton perjured himself and that he is responsible for the law that required his testimony. Even if Jones was the most dishonest person in history it doesn't change anything. If you recognize that and want to move on to the separate issue of whether or not Monica was telling the truth I suppose I could do so, but your a lot more interested in it than I am. I don't have supernatural powers to devine the truth of the situation. Sex with employees on the job is somewhat relevant to a case of alleged sexual harassment. Despite this relevance a case can be made that Clinton shouldn't have been asked questions about Monica, but he is to blame for that as well. Alleged lies about WMD wouldn't even be illegal if they where real, and alleged relationships with strippers wouldn't be relevant to WMD issues, even under Clinton's Arkansas law, let alone relevant national law, DC law, or Texas law. None of their business. Clinton made it their business. One more thing to blame him for...