SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Condor who wrote (52207)5/18/2006 6:40:05 PM
From: Rocket Red  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 313046
 
salting samples this is 2006 not 1996



To: Condor who wrote (52207)5/18/2006 9:17:09 PM
From: kacy_in_LA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 313046
 
jp is over the top on this ... but it certainly doesn't rise to the level of libel, as he carefully worded his post. Besides, if salting occurred, the stock would have gone to 70, not 7.



To: Condor who wrote (52207)5/19/2006 8:26:12 AM
From: Cage Rattler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 313046
 
Perhaps if you re-read the comment chain, you might recognize a less sinister intent.

These type markets are frustrating as well as interesting and can elicit extreme psychological defense mechanism in us all -- which after all was the intended message of in my original postings. It’s a good time to learn by observing behavior for those willing to do so.

For those with open minds, consider reading Extraordinary Popular Delusions: And the Madness of Crowds, by Charles MacKay. This is a classic, originally published in 1841, and it deals with landmark market events and human behaviors. At least read a few of the reader reviews of this fascinating book on Amazon -- someone might learn something.

Nevertheless, use the free ignore button to simply avoid all future and possible frustrating or offensive postings.

Sorry to have rattled the old cage my friend... and please just take this particular posting at face value.

:^)