SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (68235)5/19/2006 3:10:43 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 362861
 
SPECIAL ALERT: How To Impeach A President (And A Vice-President)
____________________________________________________________

The California Strategy

May 19, 2006

By thepen

"CALL TO ACTION" PAGE: impeachteam.com

Dear Friends and Activists,

We already know so many of you feel very strongly that the well-deserved impeachment of President Bush and vice-president Cheney is long overdue. We don't have to recite their many lies and illegal acts which have been allowed by a spineless Congress. The question is, what will persuade these worthless incumbents that we the people are SERIOUS about demanding accountability?

There can only be one answer. They must see one of their cowardly own lose an election to a candidate taking a strong stand for impeachment, and we don't have to wait until November to do it. In fact, the sooner the better. And that means a successful primary challenge.

For the next three weeks we are going to put every effort into making that a reality in California. There is already a movement in the CA legislature to initiate the call for impeachment (AJR 39), using a Congressional rule allowing a state to do that. And, we have at least two Congressional candidates in Democratic primaries in the Los Angeles area who have agreed to team up to take a stand on an impeachment platform, Charles Coleman, Jr. (CA-28) and Bob McCloskey (CA-29). These are two very safe Democratic districts, so whoever wins the primary will certainly win in November as well.

As you know, these candidates already have their own action pages on impeachment. What they have agreed to do is dedicate the bulk of any donations they receive from you from this email to running "call to action" campaign ads to encourage even MORE people to speak out now. What this means is that any contribution you can make will go directly into building the movement for impeachment itself. Please read on and you will understand the importance of this.

"CALL TO ACTION" PAGE: impeachteam.com

Some fear that taking a strong stand for impeachment will hurt our chances in November. The opposite is in fact true. Your fellow constituents, and this crosses party lines, are just as appalled as you are with our current members of Congress and their continued failure to stand up for us. Strong candidates who are NOT afraid to speak the truth, and NOT afraid to stand up now help our chances in November. By supporting these candidates, we can inspire the turnout we need to overcome the expected pre-meditated election fraud.

Some fear that challenging the president will mobilize his base against us. What base? Less than 30% still cling to the vain belief that Bush and Cheney are either competent or truthful. Instead, we will rally our own base in a way that is not otherwise possible, and it will be the other side who sits out the election in disgust with the neocon nightmare we have for an Administration.

Some fear that any replacement for either Bush or Cheney might be equally as bad, however, once enough people have spoken out to make impeachment happen in the first place, we will have the power to control who the successor is. And that successor, must of course be approved by Congress, a Congress finally chastened by the people's voice.

What we are asking is that everyone who reads this should contribute at least ten dollars to help these brave candidates run their call to action ads. They want to run ads on Air America, not just in Los Angeles, but nationally to build the people's impeachment movement. They want to run ads in the L.A. Times so that the impeachment movement has real visibility. If each and every one of you can just contribute what you can now, this could be a real tipping point.

"CALL TO ACTION" PAGE: impeachteam.com

If you can contribute more, what a blessing that would be. There are many for whom $25, $50 or $100 is something they could comfortably do. Imagine what it would be like if you were so fortunate as to be able to contribute the campaign limit of $2100 to one of these worthy candidates. That's enough to buy an entire WEEK's worth of Air America streaming ads, calling on progressives everywhere to join the impeachment movement now.

We have spent two years complaining about the incumbents we have now, watching as they have failed us again and again. Now we have the chance to actually DO something about it. What we are asking is that even if you respond to no other appeal this year, THIS is the one that counts. THIS is the one that could mean the difference between being stuck with the same smug losers for what could be the last gasp of our great democracy, or replacing them NOW with candidates with the courage to take a stand for us.

This is your chance America. This is your chance to be rid of Bush and his gang of cronies forever. They remain in power only because they have conned you out of your own democracy. They remain in power only because we have not yet all spoken out at one time, all at the same time, to finally throw them out.

Look at what they have done to our country. Look at what it costs you every day extra just in the increase in gas prices caused entirely by their reckless destabilization of the Middle East, which they are determined to turn into an even wider conflagration. Look at all the money they have stolen from your own pocket to give lavish gifts to their most wealthy corporate cronies, in unlimited interest rates, propped up prescription drug prices, and paid for by the gutting of programs for the most needy.

Then, please think what it would be worth to you to remove our tormentors from office right now. And whatever that number is, make that donation today to build the impeachment movement which will make it happen.

Please take action NOW, so we can win all victories that are supposed to be ours, and forward this message to everyone else you know.

opednews.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (68235)5/20/2006 1:30:28 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362861
 
Make Poetry, Not War
_________________________________________________________

By MAUREEN DOWD
Op-Ed Columnist
The New York Times
May 20, 2006

It was a rough crowd for agents of American imperialism.

At the New School commencement at Madison Square Garden's theater yesterday afternoon, dozens of the red-and-black-gowned graduates and some faculty were heckling, cackling, hissing, booing, jeering, whooping, bolting, turning their backs and holding up orange signs that read, "Our commencement is not your platform." As for John McCain, he spoke about how the "passion for self-expression sometimes overwhelms our civility."

"We're graduating, not voting," one young man yelled.

"This is all about you," another called out. "We don't care."

A little while after the senator quoted Yeats about the fleeting nature of beauty, a student sarcastically called out, "More poetry."

First, Mr. McCain and the New School's president, Bob Kerrey, were slapped around by a student speaker, Jean Sara Rohe, a 21-year-old from Nutley, N.J., who sang a lyric from a peace song and then abandoned her original remarks to talk about the "outrage" over Mr. McCain's speaking gig.

"The senator does not reflect the ideals upon which this university was founded," Ms. Rohe said, adding: "I am young, and although I don't profess to possess the wisdom that time affords us, I do know that pre-emptive war is dangerous and wrong."

She continued: "And I know that despite all the havoc that my country has wrought overseas in my name, Osama bin Laden still has not been found, nor have those weapons of mass destruction."

The New School, of course, makes New York University seem like Liberty University in Lynchburg, Va., where Mr. McCain kowtowed last weekend to Jerry Falwell, the looney-toon he formerly deemed an agent of intolerance. (Just as Rudy buddy-buddied with Ralph Reed in Atlanta.)

The ultraliberal kids at the New School, the pacifist Greenwich Village university, think of themselves as free-thinking rabble-rousers in a world where many college kids, complacently cocooned under iPods, don't even like to debate, much less protest.

When a rigid-faced Mr. Kerrey chided the audience for being rude, a young woman yelled out, "You're a war criminal!" And a guy chimed in, "Yes, you are!"

It was a remarkable tableau to see the two iconoclastic vets, their bodies beneath the black gowns still bearing broken pieces from Vietnam, being pilloried by kids angry about another endless war, faceless enemy and feckless defense secretary.

Senator McCain came to Mr. Kerrey's defense in 2001. That's when graduate students called for the New School president to resign and for Congress to investigate him because a Times magazine piece had revealed that he had led a Seals unit that killed up to 20 unarmed civilians, most of them women and children.

(The Pentagon is now investigating a case in Haditha, Iraq, where marines are accused of killing 15 unarmed Iraqis from two families, including 7 women and 3 children.)

Yesterday, Mr. Kerrey returned the favor, admonishing the students that when they are "heckling from an audience ... no bravery is required."

The Arizona senator did not depart from his text and engage the students, as Bill Clinton might have done, with a passionate exegesis of his stance. And, still trying to show that his temper is under control, he did not push back, as Rudy Giuliani might have.

He may have even found the screaming students useful, as a liberal hippie foil that will endear him to the evangelical base he's smooching up. Mr. McCain's adviser, John Weaver, talked dismissively of the West Village students, saying they should get out more and hear opposing viewpoints.

Mr. McCain's panderthon grew even more absurd this week. He let the Wyly brothers — the Texas businessmen who financed a $2.5 million ad campaign in 2000 trashing his environmental record, a move that enraged Mr. McCain and spurred him to call the Wylys W.'s "sleazy Texas buddies" — hold a fund-raiser for him in Dallas.

The senator may have wanted to give the same commencement speech at Liberty, the New School and Columbia as a way of showing those disillusioned by his snuggling with old enemies that he is still a straight talker, willing to say the same thing to Southern conservatives and Northern liberals.

But Bob Kerrey better summed up the feeling of many of us about the New McCain in the new issue of Men's Vogue. He mocked the senator's coziness with W., telling Ned Martel: "He kissed him! McCain let Bush's lips touch him. Yuck!"



To: American Spirit who wrote (68235)5/20/2006 2:49:08 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362861
 
Democratic Activists Seek to Punish Their Own for Backing Bush
_____________________________________________________________

Published on May 19, 2006 by Bloomberg.com

Democratic activist groups that mounted an aggressive campaign against President George W. Bush in the 2004 election have a new target: Democrats who support his policies.

A loose network of organizations, ranging from women's groups to Internet bloggers, is pressuring incumbents such as Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut and Representatives Jane Harman of California and Melissa Bean of Illinois, in some cases by backing insurgent candidates in primary elections.

The groups charge that these and other Democrats have been too supportive of Bush on issues like Iraq and trade, and say they're trying to energize voters disillusioned with a party that has failed to draw clear distinctions with Republicans.

With Democrats holding a wide advantage in public-opinion polls six months before the congressional elections, the party must define its identity, said David Sirota, a Democratic activist.

``If Democrats are really about to get into power, now's the time to let them know what they need to be for,'' said Sirota, who wrote ``Hostile Takeover,'' a book about political corruption.

The organizations and Web logs that identify themselves as the party's ``progressive'' wing include MoveOn.org, a coalition of groups that raised $60 million and enlisted 100,000 volunteers in the 2004 elections; DailyKos, a blog that averages 20 million visitors a month; and Democracy for America, a political action committee with 500 affiliates.

The issues they're promoting include setting a timetable for withdrawing troops from Iraq, building environmental protections into U.S. trade agreements and cracking down on what they say is price-gouging by oil companies.

Angry Public

And they're tapping into public anger. Polls show that more than half of Americans say the U.S. shouldn't have invaded Iraq, and most think the Bush administration has no clear plan for keeping down energy prices.

Ed Kilgore, vice president for policy of the Democratic Leadership Council -- a Washington-based group that says it represents the party's ``vital center'' -- cautions that the primary challenges risk undermining the Democratic Party just as it may be poised to regain control of Congress.

``At a time when we're desperately trying to take back Congress and win a majority of governorships, I'm not sure it makes a whole lot of sense for Democrats nationally to be wasting money on primary challenges,'' Kilgore said.

Connecticut Challenge

In Connecticut, Lieberman, the Democrats' 2000 vice presidential nominee, is facing a challenge in the August primary from Ned Lamont, a 52-year-old Greenwich businessman stressing his opposition to the Iraq war. A recent poll by Rasmussen Reports, an independent survey company in Ocean Grove, New Jersey, showed about a third of Democratic primary voters backing Lamont, the great-grandson of legendary J.P. Morgan & Co. Chairman Thomas W. Lamont, over Lieberman, 64, a supporter of Bush's war policies.

On May 16, the National Organization for Women announced its endorsement of Lamont, and MoveOn.org said yesterday it will poll its 50,000 Connecticut members in an online ``primary'' on May 25 to determine whether they want to back Lieberman or Lamont.

In California, Harman, 60, a six-term House veteran, has a rare primary challenger in Marcy Winograd, 52, president of Progressive Democrats of Los Angeles. Winograd has criticized Harman's support for the Patriot Act, which expanded law- enforcement authority to fight terrorism, and the Iraq war. Winograd's supporters temporarily blocked the state party's endorsement of Harman, although the incumbent ultimately received the backing for the June primary.

Teamsters and Trade

In Illinois' eighth district, the Teamsters union is withholding support for one-term incumbent Bean, 44, over her support for the Central American Free Trade Agreement.

In Washington state, incumbent Senator Maria Cantwell, 47, faces several challengers in a September primary whose campaigns are fueled by anger over her support for the war. They include Mark Wilson, a former Marine who's running as a Democrat, and Aaron Dixon, a former Black Panther Party leader who is running as a Green Party candidate.

In Texas, Representative Henry Cuellar fought off a challenge from Ciro Rodriguez, an opponent backed by labor and environmental groups who got 41 percent of the vote in the Democratic primary in March.

In Pennsylvania, Senate candidate Bob Casey Jr.'s anti- abortion stance was attacked in television ads. While Casey, the state treasurer, fought off a primary challenge this week from Alan Sandals, his opponent won the support of a number of local officials.

Minnesota, Oregon

Gubernatorial races in Minnesota and Oregon, where Governor Ted Kulongoski faces re-election, have also featured challenges from the left. Kulongoski, 65, came under criticism from environmentalists, health-care advocates and some labor groups before the state's May 16 primary. Former state Treasurer Jim Hill, who opened his campaign by declaring that Kulongoski is ``not a good Democrat,'' got almost a third of the vote despite a late start to his campaign.

The Democratic Leadership Council's Kilgore says it isn't true that the party is failing to provide an alternative to Republican policies. ``It's ludicrous,'' he said. ``There's less doubt right now than there's ever been about the differences.''

Ignoring the rift won't make it disappear, said Tom Matzzie, Washington director for MoveOn.org. ``There's already a gigantic gulf in the party,'' he said.

The activist groups say their strategy is broader than merely challenging Democrats in primaries. They say they also want to pressure party-backed candidates to take definitive positions.

`Stand Up'

``The other part of this is getting candidates to stand up for what they believe in and not being mealy-mouthed about it,'' said Jim Dean, president of Democracy for America, a group inspired by former Vermont Governor Howard Dean's presidential run in 2004. Jim Dean, Howard's brother, cited Massachusetts Senator John Kerry's call in October for a phased withdrawal from Iraq and expression of regret over his vote for the war.

Even though progressives will find it difficult to win in the primaries, that's unlikely to deter them, said Mark Rozell, a public policy professor at George Mason University in Arlington, Virginia. ``To pull off some victories here and there will be enough to energize much of the left base,'' he said.

To Rozell, what's at stake is ``the heart and soul'' of the Democratic Party. ``The Republicans had that battle, and the moderates pretty much lost,'' he said. ``The Democrats now have to confront where the center of the party is.''

Copyright 2006 Bloomberg.com