Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (66339)	5/19/2006 10:27:23 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

only a year before 9/11 the PNAC had expressed their desire for a “catastrophic and catalysing event - a new Pearl Harbor,” Of course that is NOT what the document says, you lying pice of vermin. You disgust me with your petty Bush hating nonsense. Go seek the psychiatric help you so desparately need you delusional nitwit. J.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (66339)	5/19/2006 11:43:14 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

This does beg the question: Could the US have invaded Iraq without having first invaded Afghanistan? The GOPwinger thinking was that the emotion--both dometically and internationally--that carried the first war would carry over into the second. The second war, without any credible evidence for propagation, was more difficult which is why we saw so much fear--anthrax incidents, terror alerts, false witnessing and documentation, etc.--placed upon the people in the run-up to the war. They just barely made it, as Bush's support for the invasion of Iraq was slightly over 50 percent--a mark I personally believe they felt was necessary in order to carry out invading Iraq. Again, could the US have invaded Iraq without having first invaded Afghanistan?