Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (66351)	5/19/2006 11:57:26 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

He won't read that. I doubt anyone on the right will read it. It's people on the right who wrote it. TP

To: PartyTime who wrote (66351)	5/19/2006 1:23:08 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 173976

Not only did I read it...I used his own quote to provide proof positive what a lying scumbag PussyPaw really is.....

To: PartyTime who wrote (66351)	5/19/2006 1:59:39 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Here is the passage I found on pg 51. If you are referring to another part please advise: ”Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” I don’t see the ‘desire’ for catastrophic and catalyzing event in this text. I see a long range planning document that takes into account how a catastrophic event might impact our future. I see it as thoughtful and forward looking to consider the very high likelihood that such an event could occur. The document seems to be some sort of forward looking white paper. Considering the changes that have occurred since 2000, that makes the document 1) obsolete, and 2) irrelevant. It’s like drumming up old slave laws from Georgia and claiming they represent current societal policy.