SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (64672)5/24/2006 9:51:04 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 206093
 
Bush pledges peaceful reaction to Iran. Compare this with: "All options are on the table.". Cooling down.

Bush pledges peaceful reaction to Iran

1.00pm Wednesday May 24, 2006


The United States will seek peaceful UN Security Council action to put pressure on Iran over its nuclear ambitions, President George W. Bush has said.

UN Security Council powers are preparing to meet to produce a joint strategy to persuade Iran to stop enriching uranium, which can be used for nuclear weapons.

Officials from the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany will meet in London on Wednesday, local time.

Speaking in Washington, Bush said the US wanted to resolve the issue without force.

"Obviously we'd like to solve this issue peacefully and diplomatically, and the more the Iranians refuse to negotiate in good faith the more countries are beginning to realize that we must continue to work together," he told reporters.

He cited Tehran's rejection of a proposal in which other countries would provide fuel so that Iran could generate civilian nuclear power, and then pick up the spent fuel.

"I'm not so sure these people really do want a solution. And therefore let us make sure that we're willing to be working together in the UN Security Council," Bush said. "We're on the cusp of going to the Security Council."

Russia and China have so far been reluctant to impose stronger measures, such as sanctions, on Iran if it fails to curb its nuclear activities, which Western powers believe are a cover for developing atomic weapons.

Tehran maintains it's nuclear programme is only for civilian power generation.



To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (64672)5/27/2006 6:11:59 PM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 206093
 
Cooling down: Iran and Iraq to Work on Sealing Border Against Insurgents


By JOHN F. BURNS
Published: May 28, 2006
BAGHDAD, Iraq, May 27 — Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki of Iran, on the second day of his visit to Iraq, said Saturday that the two countries had agreed to form a joint commission to oversee border issues and that its primary task would be to "block saboteurs" crossing the 700-mile border.

"We plan to form a joint commission between Iran and Iraq to control our borders and block the way to saboteurs whose aim is to destabilize the security of the two countries," Mr. Mottaki said in Najaf after talks with Iraq's most powerful Shiite religious leader, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani.

Mr. Mottaki, who was taking part in only the second by an official Iranian government delegation since the downfall of Saddam Hussein, said improved border controls would be part of a wide effort to build close ties between the countries, including $1 billion in Iranian economic assistance to Shiite and Kurdish areas of Iraq.

The announcement in Najaf was made as American military commanders and diplomats were focusing new attention on what they said was strong evidence that a covert flow of weapons and money from Iran to Shiite militia groups in Iraq had fueled sectarian violence here. Action to tighten security on the weakly patrolled Iran-Iraq border is among the measures the Americans have urged on the new Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki.

The issue is fraught with political complexity in Iraq, where the Maliki government includes Shiite leaders with links to at least two militias. The militias have been accused of participating in a brutal cycle of sectarian violence that has killed hundreds of people in Baghdad and other major cities in recent months, in revenge for the relentless attacks on Shiites by Sunni insurgent groups.

American officials met with Mr. Maliki this week to brief him on what they contend are a range of clandestine Iranian efforts to gain influence in Iraq, and to urge the new government leader to take action to restrain that effort as part of his promise to curb all militias in Iraq.

Mr. Maliki's action on this and other security issues has been curbed, at least to some degree, by the continuing jockeying among the ruling parties over the government's top three security posts, which were left unfilled when his government took office a week ago.

A senior United States military official in Baghdad said Saturday that he expected the ministers of interior, defense and national security to be named "within two or three days." Similar predictions were made by Mr. Maliki and American officials last weekend, but candidates brought forward at midweek for two of the posts — a senior Shiite military officer for the interior post, and a Sunni expatriate living in London for the defense ministry — failed to win approval by all the major groups involved, including senior American officials, who said that the two men proposed for the posts seemed unlikely to have enough authority to impose control.

Mr. Maliki is acting as interim interior minister, and has appointed another senior official to oversee the defense ministry in an acting capacity. But the delay in completing his government, and particularly in filling the security posts, has been an embarrassing start for a government that came to office under pressure to show it can be more effective than the departing government of the former prime minister, Ibrahim al-Jaafari.

The Jaafari government was widely viewed by Iraqis as a failure, incapable of making any significant improvement to deteriorating public services or of stemming the rising tide of sectarian violence.

Top American officials have said that Mr. Maliki has a matter of weeks, months at most, to show that he can take control. These officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the delicacy of their relations with Iraqi leaders, have said that another failure on the scale of Mr. Jaafari's could fundamentally undermine the American undertaking here, and with it the hope of progressing over 18 months or so to orderly American troop reductions.

American commanders say that "governmental competence" has lagged far behind the growing abilities of Iraq's new American-trained security forces, with 260,000 men, and that the new Iraq is more likely to fail now because of government muddling and infighting than for want of effective forces to sustain it.

The border issue is just one of the challenges facing the Maliki government and American forces here. The top American commander in Iraq, Gen. George W. Casey Jr., traveled by helicopter this week to two points along the Iranian border northeast of Baghdad to assess the effectiveness of Iraqi border police posts along the frontier, and was told by Iraqi border commanders that they had only a fraction of the manpower, vehicles and fuel they needed to control cross-border smuggling and infiltration.

The Americans say they believe that men, weapons and money are reaching at least two Shiite militia groups: the Badr Organization that is controlled by the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, a powerful body in the Maliki government; and the Mahdi Army, which is loyal to the volatile Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr, who has loyalists in the new government even as he is declaring his hostility to the American military presence here.

The Americans believe that some of the weapons and ammunition reaching Baghdad come across the Diyala Province border east and north of Baghdad, and are taken to brick kilns in the vicinity of the Diyala capital of Baquba, 50 miles northeast of the capital, before being shipped into Baghdad hidden among truckloads of bricks.

A new wave of violence across Iraq in the 24 hours until Saturday evening killed at least 15 people, according to police reports. In Baghdad, a bomb in a parked car exploded near a busy police station on Saturday morning, killing four civilians. There were at least four attacks on police patrols, with 1 officer killed and at least 13 wounded by a roadside bombing and a series of drive-by shootings. On Friday night, a shooting spree broke out when a referee disallowed a goal during a soccer game in the Risafa neighborhood, leaving two men dead.

Baquba had at least three attacks on police targets on Saturday, including an ambush that killed the city's deputy police chief and four other officers. Two other policemen, one a general, died in separate attacks.



To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (64672)7/13/2006 8:21:25 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206093
 
Heating up: Iran's trap for Israel

THE PURPOSE and the timing of Hezbollah's attack on Israel yesterday should be transparent to all concerned. Hezbollah's rocket attacks into northern Israel and the group's capture of two Israeli soldiers during an ambush inside Israeli territory have been presented by Hezbollah as a military action in solidarity with Hamas and Palestinians suffering under Israeli assaults in Gaza. Hezbollah says its aim is to force Israel to release Palestinian and Hezbollah detainees in exchange for the two soldiers held in Lebanon and the one still held in Gaza.

But it is an open secret throughout the region that the Lebanese Shi'ite movement Hezbollah functions as an extension of the theocratic regime that rules Iran.

The timing of the Hezbollah action could not be more revealing. Hezbollah commandos crossed into Israel on the same day that Iran was supposed to give its answer to the package of incentives that the five permanent Security Council members plus Germany offered to Iran if it will suspend uranium enrichment and enter negotiations to bring it into compliance with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Because no answer was forthcoming from Tehran, yesterday was also the day that the five permanent Security Council members expressed ``profound disappointment" at Iran's refusal to respond, and said they ``have no choice but to return to the United Nations Security Council" to consider possible sanctions against Iran.

Hezbollah's attack on Israel serves not only to distract from Iran's defiance of the international community. It also plays into a propaganda campaign that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran has conducted in recent months, conflating the issue of Iran's nuclear program with what he has condemned as the intolerable existence of Israel. Also, by having Hezbollah strike now at Israel, the Iranian regime clearly means to neutralize Arab regimes that are fearful of Iran's spreading influence in Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon.

President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt had just disclosed publicly that he had worked out a prisoner swap with Israel and Hamas, but that ``other parties" he would not name forced Hamas to sabotage the deal. It can be assumed that Syria and Iran are the other parties, the two countries having signed a military cooperation agreement last month that Syria's defense minister described as establishing ``a joint front against Israel."

Knowing that Iran is behind Hezbollah's act of war, Israeli leaders -- who are openly warning of devastating strikes on Lebanon's infrastructure -- would be well advised to avoid a reflexive military response that lands Israel in an Iranian trap. If the regime in Tehran wants to provoke Israel to bomb Lebanese power plants, roads, and bridges, maybe this kind of military retaliation is not such a good idea.



To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (64672)9/1/2006 6:54:10 PM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206093
 
Carter to Meet with Former Iran President Khatami State Department is reported to have issued Khatami a diplomatic visa, which means that he will neither be searched nor fingerprinted upon his entry into the US.

Carter to Meet with Former Iran President Khatami
September 01, 2006 10:02 AM EST


By Sher Zieve – Former Democrat President Jimmy Carter has scheduled a meeting with former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami. Carter is said to have used his influence to allow the former Iranian leader into the country. The US State Department is reported to have issued Khatami a diplomatic visa, which means that he will neither be searched nor fingerprinted upon his entry into the US.

Carter is said to have been single-handedly responsible for the downfall of the Shah of Iran, which lead to the 1979 Iranian Islamic fundamentalist revolution and its takeover of the US Embassy in Iran in 1979. After the embassy’s takeover, US hostages were held for 444 days.

The hostages were finally released, 20 minutes after President Ronald Reagan gave his inaugural address.