SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (167134)5/21/2006 9:32:46 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 794410
 
To have an example, I do submit through Preview/Spellcheck? but if I miss something, I donot use the 15 minute edit to fix as that changes the example. In last post I noticed I said single forward quote or apostrophe but showed a back single quote this post fixes that, I hope... LOL...

You cannot abuse until you know the rules. TOM's rule works.
FYI, how it works this five minutes. but the link to pic that shows is not the same as in the examples that show html and SI coding.

This is my full explanation... of coding that works all the time independent of how post is submitted.

Use the forward ' single quote or apostrophe not the back ` single quote in place of a " in normal html code.

normal html will not tranlate to chart.
<img src="http://america.ath.cx/320x240/1339406.jpg">

Normal chart. will not tranlate thrugh Preview/Spellcheck?


but if you use chart code, submit using Preview/Spellcheck? and then simply use 15 edit and do nothing but submit it will code properly and image will appear.

TOM's method of using slightly modified normal html works all the time and the first time.

html with back single quote will not work.
<img src=`http://america.ath.cx/320x240/1339406.jpg`>
and the way that will work even submitting through Preview/Spellcheck?

The normal html code style except use a single quote or apostrophe instead of the double quote


New SI Interface Discussion
Message 22472824



To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (167134)5/21/2006 12:16:31 PM
From: ManyMoose  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794410
 
OK, let's see if I can edit something that you say does not work into something that you say does work. Here goes.