SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (68490)5/22/2006 12:08:04 PM
From: SiouxPal  Respond to of 362826
 
I believe you. Bet he's happy happy now.



To: American Spirit who wrote (68490)5/23/2006 4:13:26 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362826
 
Former Bush backer urges Republican split
___________________________________________________________

Posted at 1:55pm on 22 May 2006

In an open split with the US President George Bush, a powerful American conservative lobbyist has called for like-minded Americans to stop funding the Republican Party and start an independent movement instead.

Richard Viguerie was instrumental in cementing the winning coalitions behind Ronald Reagan in 1980 and George W Bush in 2000 but he has now declared conservatives have become disillusioned with congressional Republicans.

He has called on conservatives to form a powerful movement that is independent of any party and boycott November's election.

Instead, he suggests that they lay the groundwork for an election campaign in 2008 and hope that a new generation of conservative leaders has emerged by then.

Ominous sign
Mr Viguerie's public outburst is seen as another ominous sign for the party less than six months before the November congressional vote.

A Washington Post-ABC News opinion poll released last week found Republican disapproval of Mr Bush's presidency has increased from 16% to 30% in just one month.

Mr Viguerie has acknowledged that a conservative boycott in November will likely spell defeat for the Republicans but insists it would be for the long-term good of the conservative movement.

Traditional conservatives, who abhor big government and excessive spending, equate abortion with murder and emphasise individualism, have always formed the so-called "base" of the Republican Party and determined its political viability.

Copyright © 2006 Radio New Zealand

radionz.co.nz



To: American Spirit who wrote (68490)5/23/2006 11:21:15 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362826
 
basically, economic disaster has always been the last refuge against ANY environmental argument...

thinkprogress.org

republican cheat sheet:

1) any argument against “the war” can be refuted in the following ways-

a) accuse the person of having a “pre-9/11 mentality”
b) ask, “would you rather fight them over there or over here?”
c) if all else fails, they must hate america...be sure to inform the RNC of this terrorist threat.

2) any argument about the environment or “global warming” -
“there will be inevitable economic disaster should the eco-terrorists like al gore be allowed to enforce their will.” remember - ENVIRONMENTALISTS WANT ECONOMIC DISASTER!

3) any argument against administration or republican economic policies -
“actually, the economy is strong, but the liberal media refuse to report the success of bush’s tax cuts.”

4) any argument against the “terrorist surveillance plan” -
“if you’re not a terrorist, you should have nothing to hide and no reason to fear the NSA doing its job to protect our national security”

5) remember, when all else fails, BLAME CLINTON. we’ve used this effectively for 13 years and expect to be able to continue for at least another decade. god bless bill clinton (the despicable sinner), he really is the gift that keeps on giving for republicans.

Comment by Progressaurus Rex — May 23, 2006 @ 9:48 pm



To: American Spirit who wrote (68490)5/23/2006 11:40:53 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362826
 
Du Pont, Limbaugh distorted scientific research to downplay global warming

mediamatters.org



To: American Spirit who wrote (68490)5/24/2006 3:20:35 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362826
 
Enter Ozone Woman
________________________________________________________________

By MAUREEN DOWD
Op-Ed Columnist
The New York Times
May 24, 2006

Al Gore must want to punch Hillary Clinton right through the hole in the ozone layer.

At the National Press Club here yesterday, the New York senator finally took a passionate stand. After giving a courteous nod to her old rival Al as "a committed visionary on global warming," she purloined his issue and his revolution, going his Earth Tones in the Balance one better by wearing a blinding yellow pantsuit that looked as if it could provide solar power to all of Tennessee.

Apologizing for, while really wallowing in, her "wonkish speech," Hillary waxed rhapsodic about "unlocking the full potential of cellulosic ethanol" and getting "the low-sulfur diesel rule fully implemented." She droned on numbingly about carbon dioxide sequestration, biomass liquid fuel bases, "feebate" tax incentives, hybrid plug-ins, flex-fueled vehicles, continuous reheat furnaces, renewable portfolio standards, Danish wind power, Brazilian ethanol and Kyoto greenhouse targets. (And you thought she was incomprehensible on health care.)

She got so far down in the weeds — or switch grass — that she advised her listeners about weatherizing their homes and checking their tires to save fuel. "At every gas station," she chirped, "there ought to be a little sign which says, 'Have you checked to see if your tires are inflated to the right pressure?' "

She made it clear who's in power and who's in Cannes when she ostentatiously promised to take her motorcade back to Capitol Hill and introduce legislation for a strategic energy fund to jolt inert government and insatiable Big Oil into action.

Her timing is cunning. This is supposed to be Ozone Man's moment in the sun. His movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," opens today, buoyed by such raves that his supporters believe his green crusade could net him both a gold statuette and a white house.

He's being hailed as the new Comeback Kid, as New York magazine calls him, a passionate pedant. (Better than a compassionate conservative.)

Shaken by the Asian tsunami, Katrina, gas prices and a literally explosive Middle East, many Americans now see the environment and conservation as the scintillating, life-and-death subjects that Al Gore has always presented them as, rather than the domain of cartoonish sandal-wearing, tree-hugging, New Age-y, antibusiness wackos.

As John Heilemann notes in New York, the Gore boomlet is also driven by "the creeping sense of foreboding about the prospect of Hillary Clinton's march to her party's nomination." Hollywood's top environmental campaigner, Laurie David, a producer on the Gore movie, argued, "It's not time to experiment with trying to put in office the first female president or with somebody people feel is such a polarizing figure."

Some Democrats are secretly compiling data to prove that Hillary is unelectable to derail the notion that she's inevitable. Gore loyalists suggest that they could be co-front-runners — a couple of raccoons in a bag.

The two hall monitors have always bumped against each other, first competing to be Bill Clinton's co-president, and then over Democratic money in the 2000 election.

So we are left with the prospect of a race between these two Democrats (Al, a popularly elected president; Hillary, a co-ruler). Neither was president, but both think they have been. Al's a seeker and Hillary's a triangulator (or you might say she's inflating her tires to the right pressure). They have shared the problem of stiff, situational personae, when they seemed to wake up every morning trying to figure out who they should be, how they should appear or how they should position themselves. By fashioning their identities all the time, they condemned themselves to being seen merely as identity fashioners.

Hillary is keeping Bill at a distance so he doesn't overshadow her, contradict her, embarrass her or hurt her attempt to pander to the right. But Al, who says he and Bill have made up and are now brotherly, may want to embrace the Big Dog this time, realizing the cost of muzzling him in 2000 (and the cost of taking hired guns' advice to soft-peddle the environment).

Since Hillary and Bill often rendezvous to watch "Grey's Anatomy" on Sunday nights, that's a good time for her to soak up his unmatched political smarts.

But as someone in Bill's circle wryly told Mr. Heilemann, the boy can't help himself: "You can see him talking to Hillary one minute, then ducking into his study to take Gore's call and advise him on how to beat her."

What a contest: two ersatz ex-presidents vying for the support of a real one.



To: American Spirit who wrote (68490)5/24/2006 5:28:41 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362826
 
Patriotism in a Time of War
___________________________________________________________

In April, 35 years after calling for a troop withdrawal from Vietnam, John Kerry delivered this speech at Boston’s Faneuil Hall.

vanityfair.com