Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (61869)	5/24/2006 1:47:00 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

"It's no business of mine or yours." I absolutely agree. She has presented herself as a monogamous married woman, who has dealt with marital discord in her private life, and unfortunately in a public lime light, not of her choosing. I would give her high marks for the way she has handled this difficulty in her own admirable manner up to now. I see her privacy as having been violated by all the media coverage in a very abusive manner. In the process she has come out very far on who she is as a woman, wife, and social person. What ever she has chosen to keep private is fine with me. The question was a hypothetical and it really isn't fair for us to go on and on about Hillary as though it were an established fact. My only comment in the beginning and at this point is, if we found her (or any representative) to be less than genuine in representing her personality as a public image, that would reflect on credibility as a representative for other people and on issues. It would be no different than if she did photo ops as a spokes person for the humane society, then we found out she hates domestic animals as pets, and the people who keep them. I see no good cause to go looking for such things or to allege them without substance.

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (61869)	5/24/2006 11:28:19 AM
From: one_less	Respond to of 93284

You're still not getting help on that reading comprehension problem eh? You: "You're saying that you can't accept her being private about her private life." Nope. I've said no such thing. In fact, I have said making any allegations about her private life without substance is wrong. And I have said, "What ever she has chosen to keep private is fine with me." You: "That she's representing herself as being something she's not." Nope. I didn't say that, you made it up. You: "I'm unaware of any impression that Hillary has given with respect to this matter and I hope she remains private regardless of her chosen orientation." I have said nothing to the contrary. How do you get things so wrong every time? Its almost like you do that on purpose but it makes you look like such a baffoon, I can't imagine how that serves you in any positive manner. Are you really that dumb, just really screwed up, or is it some combination of the two?