Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (61872)	5/24/2006 10:57:39 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

"Let me see if I have this right." far from it... Oh, I see we are back to you not comprehending much, while attributing stuff to me which isn’t there and expecting me to defend that nothing stuff. Hmmmm Well, the best I can offer is some correction of your errors. You: You believe that Hillary is a "monogamous married woman". Nope: I said she has ‘represented’ herself as such. I don’t have ‘beliefs' about what Hillary is or isn’t as there seem to be some contradicting representations of her (Like comments attributed to her husband for example). Me: ” She has ‘presented herself’ as a monogamous married woman, who has dealt with marital discord in her private life, and unfortunately in a public lime light, not of her choosing. I would give her high marks for the way she has handled this difficulty in her own ’admirable’ manner up to now. You: ”…and further extrapolate her current and future sexual orientations based on absolutely nothing but innuendo. How shallow of you. Me: "It's no business of mine or yours." I absolutely agree. …. I see her privacy as having been violated by all the media coverage in a very abusive manner…. The question was a hypothetical and it really isn't fair for us to go on and on about Hillary as though it were an established fact. You: "...who cares. You seem to care, and further extrapolate her current and future sexual orientations based on absolutely nothing but innuendo. How shallow of you." The emotional concern is all yours on this topic, and I have made no such extrapolations. You: further extrapolate her current and future sexual orientations based on absolutely nothing but innuendo. Me: I see no good cause to go looking for such things or to allege them without substance. Please sign up for a reading comprehension course if you are going to do any more interpretive work. You really stink at it. You: ” Lesser of two evils?” That is the fraudulent premise you live under. I can’t help you justify it, sorry.