SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (187167)5/24/2006 5:14:21 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
Gore back in the limelight, and setting off a buzz
_____________________________________________________________

A new film about him has some hoping he will reenter politics.

By Linda Feldmann
Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
From the May 24, 2006 edition

WASHINGTON - Al Gore, the Movie, is coming soon to a theater near you. Well, maybe. But Wednesday's release of "An Inconvenient Truth," a documentary about the former vice president's crusade against global warming, has generated a wave of buzz that has set political tongues to wagging: Will he run for president again?

The liberal blogosphere is alight with chatter over a man once parodied for his stiff, pedantic style, now garnering boffo reviews for his passion and humor. Mr. Gore outshone the likes of Tom Hanks and Halle Berry at Cannes, writes the conservative - turned - progressive Arianna Huffington in her blog. On "Saturday Night Live," Gore's recent parody of himself as president - he's solved global warming and Big Oil wants a bailout - would make a good campaign ad, say the ex-veep's fans.

Gore, who lost the disputed 2000 election to President Bush, insists that after two terms as Bill Clinton's vice president and two runs for the Oval Office - he first tried in 1988 - he's done with presidential politics. In interviews, he refers to himself as a "recovering politician." But he's added a new caveat: "You always have to worry about a relapse," he recently told the Atlanta Progressive News.

Add to the mix a certain wariness from the Democrats' activist, liberal wing toward the early front-runner among potential party candidates - the centrist Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York - and there's fuel for a Draft Gore movement, if he is indeed inclined to sit out the 2008 race.

"There are a whole lot of people looking for someone willing to take on the Republicans and defend Democratic principles, and do it aggressively, in an unvarnished way, without a whole lot of positioning," says Bill Carrick, a Democratic consultant based in Los Angeles. "They're looking for authenticity. Al Gore talking about global warming in this documentary, combined with being almost alone among prominent Democrats in opposing the Iraq war in the earliest stages - a lot of Democrats find that very, very attractive."

If nothing else, the kudos from the left must be a salve to Gore. After the 2000 election, he faced criticism from Democrats - including Mr. Clinton - for running a campaign many observers felt should never have been so close, given the peace and prosperity of the times. Eventually, the former senator from Tennessee, who was a founder of the centrist Democratic Leadership Council, reemerged as a favorite of Internet-based activists, endorsing Howard Dean for the Democratic nomination in 2004 and continuing to deliver speeches sponsored by Moveon.org.

Some analysts say it's not fair to compare the non-candidate, non-officeholder Gore to Mrs. Clinton, an active legislator running for reelection and possibly higher office whose every vote and statement is parsed.

"With power comes responsibility," says Jenny Backus, a Democratic consultant in Washington. "Al Gore is having fun. He has the freedom of a non-candidate."

Still, she applauds Gore for getting out there with his views. "It's great for the party to have a lot of Democrats articulating ideas," she says.

At this stage, with the party focused intently on retaking one or both houses of Congress this November, some Democratic activists prefer not to discuss publicly what the Gore chatter says about any coolness from some in the party about a possible Hillary Clinton candidacy.

"I cannot go there right now," says Gore's 2000 campaign manager, Donna Brazile, in an e-mail. "The Gore Buzz has everything to do about Al Gore and the excitement people feel about him and what he's done since 'winning the race' in 2000. Seriously, I am not into pitting this one against the other when they would make a great team - if they decide to toss their hats in the ring."

Eli Pariser, executive director of Moveon.org, also prefers to skip discussion of what Gore's rise means for Hillary Clinton. "What you're seeing with his reemergence, in an era of deep partisanship and domination of sound bites, is someone who can be a statesman and speak eloquently about most of the current issues - that really speaks to a lot of people," he says.

Still, behind a cloak of anonymity, party activists don't hesitate to opine in forums such as the National Journal Insiders Poll. In the magazine's latest poll of 138 party insiders, issued May 13, Gore moved up to fourth place among those deemed to have the best chance to win the Democratic nomination in 2008, behind Hillary Clinton, former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner, and former vice presidential candidate John Edwards. Last December, Gore sat in ninth place. But even now, Clinton remains a formidable opponent to anyone thinking of jumping in, given her fame and fundraising ability. Of the 108 insiders who responded to the poll, 72 percent gave her first-place votes.

Still, Gore remains unique among all the others: He, too, has name recognition and big-league fundraising ability, advantages that would allow him to sit on the sidelines longer than the others.

"I don't discount Gore at all," says David Axelrod, a Democratic consultant based in Chicago. "It may not be good politics, but he's got the biggest 'I told you so' in history coming. Much of what he said in 2000 has come to pass, sadly."

Ultimately, says Mr. Axelrod, in the race for the Democratic nomination, there will be "two lanes - a Hillary lane and a Somebody Else lane, and who that other lane is, it's too soon to say."



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (187167)5/24/2006 6:38:01 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
The Transformation of Al Gore
________________________________________________________

By Richard Greene

05.23.2006

huffingtonpost.com

Al Gore may not have invented the way for human beings to connect with one another via the internet, but he is showing other politicians, and all of us, how to connect with something far more important . . . ourselves.

"An Inconvenient Truth" in 100 minutes, shows us something that pollsters, political strategists and fear had hidden from us all for eight years.

The real Al Gore.

The transformation of Al Gore . . . starting with his surprisingly relaxed concession speech in 2000 and more recently seen in his fire and brimstone speeches on the stump, his masterful appearance on Saturday Night Live and now, as the shockingly warm, intimate, passionate and soulful man and his slide show in this superb film . . . is a thrilling case study of what is so terribly wrong in politics and what can be so terribly right.

Every politician should see "An Inconvenient Truth", but not only for the scientific wisdom. They should see it because Al Gore, genuinely the professor here, shows us the true potential power of politics . . the simple yet awesome power of being one's self.

That that power wasn't there in 2000 but is, so profoundly, in the movie, illustrates what is possibly the political teaching for our time.

There are five things that great speakers and great political leaders do to engage and captivate audiences. The first four, as important as they are, are dwarfed by the fifth. They 1) Understand and use the power of voice tone and body language, 2) Have a "Lasered, Compelling Message", 3) Communicate to the people, as FDR did, all the way back in 1933 with his "Fireside Chats", in a conversational manner, rather than as a performance or presentation, 4) Speak each of the "4 Languages" or "frequencies" of human communication so they can relate to every possible audience. But, throughout history, the one quality that has defined our great speakers and our great leaders is the one quality that has been literally sucked out of most current politicians. . . . "Authentic Passion".

It is the authentic passion of one's beliefs that imprinted the speeches of Teddy Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Ronald Reagan and, in softer ways, Lou Gehrig and Bobby Kennedy on our collective consciousness.

It is an irreplaceable quality of character and leadership.

What we see in this film is that since Al Gore's college days this man has had a burning passion for this subject. So much of a passion that in 1992 he said, in his rather visionary book, "Earth in the Balance", that the environment should be "the central organizing principle for civilization".

But in 2000 Bob Shrum and his team wouldn't let him talk about it. They ripped that authentic passion, and the soul, out of their client. In his recent outstanding article in Time Magazine about how consultants are ruining politics, Joe Klein reports that he asked Tad Devine, one of Shrum's consultants, "if he'd ever considered the possibility that Gore might have been a warmer, more credible and inspiring candidate if he'd talked about the things he really wanted to talk about, like the environment?" Remarkably, Devine answers, "That's an interesting thought."

Desperate to help, back in 2000, I watched hours and hours of videotape in an effort to find one instance of "authentic passion" to show his staff. I was planning to send it with the simple note that said "do this, just do this" and you'll easily beat the Governor of Texas, who was not, and is not, a world class orator.

But when it came to discussing political issues or policy, I couldn't find one. Not one. The only example of Authentic Al Gore in the entire 2000 campaign came in a clip with Barbara Walters where he finally stopped pontificating long enough to break into a deep, warm smile and wax passionately and proudly about his amazing little grandson, Wyatt.

His exhortations, his professorial incantations, his dizzying mathematical rants on social security, his prescriptions for everything all had the cadence of forced emphasis, the lift of the head showing a touch of the "I know better than you" arrogance and a condescension that drove America nuts.

In fact, I have to confess that in my own speeches I used to use Al Gore as a role model for what NOT to do as a speaker. I would remind audiences that "Bill Clinton and Al Gore had the same team of White House Speechwriters", using the obvious disparity to illustrate the critical point that it is always the non-verbals (voice tone and body language), not the words, that make a speaker effective . . . or ineffective.

And Al Gore's non-verbals were, frankly, horrible.

His voice always went up or down on the wrong word.
His voice always punctuated the wrong syllable.
His tone was always that of someone giving a "performance" rather than the FDR, JFK, Reagan or Clinton-esque "conversation"
His body gestures were either too much or too little and usually out of "sync".
And, because of the lack of any real variation driven by any real passion, hanging in on an Al Gore speech for more than 5 or 10 minutes was almost always a chore.

But watch this man now.

He's calm, centered, relaxed and, like JFK, Reagan and Clinton, truly comfortable in his skin. His voice tone and body language, far from being stiff and awkward now, finally communicate the real guy that Al Gore has always been.

And, in the last few seconds, as he said "Live From New York, It's Saturday Night" in his "SNL" appearance as President, his ear to ear smile and the look in his eyes showed the first signs of a real charisma that few politicians or celebrities ever possess..

It's taken a "dark night of the soul" experience in 2000 and several years abstinence from toxic polls and consultants, but Al Gore, the most unlikely of heroes, is beginning to show politicians and America a different kind of "Inconvenient Truth" and that is that money and makeovers and talking points and audience research do not make politics or politicians or America better.

Al Gore, left to his own devices, left only to his own very deep and honest passion, has had a spiritual and political transformation that may, indeed, make Americans want to elect him . . . again.

His journey is the best current illustration of the real truth behind all of politics and all politicians, as best spoken by Ralph Waldo Emerson . . .

"Who you are speaks so loudly, I can hardly hear what you are saying."