Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (8864)	5/24/2006 12:18:46 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

It is criminal trespass, not undocumented entry. That is part of it I think. --We are taught from youth, that we are a nation of laws. --The ILLEGALS just by the fact of being here ILLEGALLY, are breaking our laws. --They should have NO rights of citizenship ...period. No SS, No food stamps, No free housing, No free anything. --We should have the right as a country to take in the people we think would be good citizens, NOT to take in people we don't want including some who may be criminals of various types. We don't know who is coming in, nor what illnesses they bring with them. --The biggest reason I am opposed to them is that we are spending BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars to try to protect this country...via our borders, including our water borders. Obviously, we can't have eyes everywhere. EITHER we Fix the border situation or we should just declare OPEN BORDERS. Why spend BILLIONS of dollars trying to make us safe when rifraff are coming in like scurring rats.