Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (6490)	5/24/2006 12:33:17 PM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

Global Warming science has withstood rigorous peer review, they have published their studies in peer-reviewed journals, which was not the case with the small fringe global cooling crowd. That is the version of history anyone can verify. What exactly are you talking about?!? The latest scientific studies indicate that natural CO2 feedback loops have probably not been taken in account enough in the warming models, and we will see significantly more warming than originally forcast. Sell the low lying property.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (6490)	5/24/2006 4:23:23 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 36917

What are you waiting for? A nice round 1000 articles? 10,000? The science is not questioned because the science behind global warming is indisputable. Science Magazine analyzed 928 peer-reviewed scientific papers on global warming published between 1993 and 2003. Not a single one challenged the scientific consensus that the earth’s temperature is rising due to human activity. The U.S. Climate Change Science Program concluded that humans are driving the warming trend through greenhouse gas emissions. And the EPA has said that the recent warming trend “is real and has been particularly strong within the past 20 years…due mostly to human activities.” thinkprogress.org