Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (187267)	5/24/2006 11:19:06 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Nadine, your only concern is that all the resolutions against Israel that have been veto'd by the US on the Security Council would PASS under a world government. Admit it. action-for-un-renewal.org.uk

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (187267)	5/25/2006 12:09:05 AM
From: Sun Tzu	Respond to of 281500

>> I am merely doing the simplest of straight line extrapolations from the existing one-world governmental structure And why is that? I never said the current regime was a good one. In fact I said it was a very bad one and analogous to 18th C. Aristocracy. What you are doing is to use challenges and inevitable flaws in any early system to oppose progress all together. What I am proposing is to fallow the same process that has taken part around the globe within countries. i.e. tribes to city states to nations and barbarism to hegemony to aristocracy to merchant princes to democracy. The present day setting is somewhere between hegemony and aristocracy. I want it changed to merchant princes so that democracy will arrive sooner.