Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (6549)	5/25/2006 4:03:07 PM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

No, skepticism is a healthy part of science or any profession. What is not healthy is when the debate is occuring in peer-reviewed scientific journals and trained scientists have overwhelmingly come to a conclusion and a know nothing "skeptic" still claims that there is a huge debate going on when there is not. A similiar situation is occuring in the whole evolution vs. intelligent design debate, real trained scientists with overwhelming consensus vs. a very narrow and small minority of indealogically bent scientists pushing their view that is not supported by evidence.