Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (187470)	5/26/2006 11:55:27 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

"Israel should clean 100% of the settlements" As i understand it they are pretty clean already. Seriouly thats a non-starter. You are looking at things thru a rear view mirror that wont allow peace if one parcel of land is added to israel. Thats just something the pals and you will have to get over i am afraid and right now the pals are ahead of you. As for 67, Labor was in charge in israel and would have been happy to trade all that land for peace with the arab states. There were no takers on the arab side. Just accept that or prove me wrong. The first settlements were actually used as a slap in the face to wake up arabs in general as to what would happen if there was no compromise forthcoming from then. As in 48, the arabs prefer a wretched existance for their people rather than a settlement with a non-arab state. Its one thing to be controlled by the powerful euro/american crusaders--its quite another to be defeated by a bunch of settlers and concentration camp survivors. This is something the pals and arabs must get over. Its not the jews fault than the pals committed suicide every decade or so. Sadat saw this. Hopefully the pals with and then everything is possible.