Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (289393)	6/2/2006 12:48:24 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573925

from 2001 up through most of 2005, they were running below 2000. Its hardly unusual for tax levels to be lower during a recession and in the beginning of a recovery than they where before the recession, that factor may have gone on a little longer in this case but than in 2000 the NASDAQ topped 5000. In such bubble situations you get extra revenue. Huh? Tim, read this carefully.....there was a bubble in the Nazz, not the economy. The companies that were bubblicious in the Nazz are/were a very small piece of the economy. In 2001 what we were experiencing was a slowdown in the economy from admittedly some very good, hi growth years. It wasn't even clear we would go into recession at that point. Everything in your mind is exaggerated to fit your story......reign your exaggeration please.