Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (187528)	5/29/2006 2:41:25 AM
From: DavesM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Neolib, Your arguments about frequency content, low pass filtering, intergals and derivative terms, are going to force me to pick up a DSP handbook. Not something I really considered enjoyable the first time. I have no idea of what plot you are referring. I did not see your link - I did see WarfRat's, is it the same graph? As for Temperature driving CO2, there is no doubt (IMO) that temperature drives CO2 (because CO2 is a greenhouse gas, it should be able drive global temperature as well)! I believe this is well known and is established. I don't believe that there is paleo climatologist, geologist, or astronomer who would dispute that temperature drives atmospheric CO2 concentrations. In fact, I believe that part of the argument regarding human caused CO2 emmissions and global warming is that: CO2 drives temperature, which in turn results in increased (non anthropogenic) natural CO2 releases, which results in further increases in temperature (positive feedback). As far as