SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: heatsinker2 who wrote (199000)5/27/2006 1:27:06 PM
From: combjellyRespond to of 275872
 
"Actually, tell me again why we even want dual core in a notebook??"

For most people? No real reason if it means it costs more. For those corner cases where it actually may make a difference and the user appreciates it, I suspect that they are also as interested, if not more, in 64 bits to be future proofed.

Keith and I went round and round over this one at iHub. Be saw himself as a typical notebook buyer. But, as it turned out, he was a typical notebook buyer who is willing to drop $2k+ of his own money every year or two on a notebook. My stance is that is a small and shrinking percentage of the market. I am a lot more typical in that when we need a notebook, we start scanning the Best Buy ads until they have one that matches our requirements. And our price point is well below $2k.



To: heatsinker2 who wrote (199000)5/27/2006 1:49:47 PM
From: minnow68Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
You wrote "Actually, tell me again why we even want dual core in a notebook??"

Because Windows sucks. Seriously. Windows has a nasty habit of not yielding to any other process of the same priority if one process is trying to take 100% of the CPU. How often does this happen? All the time. Ever see a mouse pause a second or two? Ever have an app freeze up for a tiny bit and then resume just fine?

Those little annoying pauses would almost all be fixed with a dual core processor. To me at least, that's the real point of dual core in a notebook. It's not worth a great deal (at least to me), but if I could get it for less than $100 extra, I'd do it.

Mike



To: heatsinker2 who wrote (199000)5/28/2006 12:39:11 AM
From: BiomavenRespond to of 275872
 
Actually, tell me again why we even want dual core in a notebook?

After my experience with my X-2 desktop, I would never go back to a single core. Outlook or a rogue program sucks up 100% of one CPU, the other is still functional.

Peter