SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (167860)5/28/2006 3:01:36 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793883
 
I told them, "If Kerry has been smeared, let him sue." He doesn't dare be cross examined on this part of his life.


His military records still aren't all released, are they? Just sorta kinda released to a tame Globe reporter, if I recall correctly.

Why does the phrase 'modified, limited hangout' spring to mind?



To: LindyBill who wrote (167860)5/28/2006 3:48:55 AM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793883
 
Don't concern yourself with A$$....He's has a few screws loose, and the rest of them are already off....As much as I personally think John Kerry is awful, I've often wondered why his tagteam let's A$$ talk for him. With supporters like that guy, one wouldn't need to have very many enemies....



To: LindyBill who wrote (167860)5/28/2006 3:58:45 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 793883
 
I poked a stick through the bars of the cage too, pointing out that whatever else Kerry might lack, it's not money or time to press a lawsuit...he can afford the best lawyers there are.

Incidentally, if Kerry's record was stellar and the Swiftvets were clearly lying, would have Kerry have a good case for libel (leaving aside obvious questions of why he hadn't in that case, just signed a Form 180 and released his records)?