Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (23704)	5/28/2006 4:04:45 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 28931

Riiiiiiight! <VBG> DAK

To: Solon who wrote (23704)	5/29/2006 5:46:10 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 28931

Well, we've come full circle!! ""So Einstein’s theory is not a replacement for Newton’s, but just an extension."" From the beginning I've said it was a radical paradigm shift of understanding as is Quantum theory and Newton's theory over the previous understanding. Meanwhile I've shown various support for my position: "Thus, Newtonian mechanics, thought originally to be of completely universal validity, was eventually found to be valid in a limited domain and only to a limited degree of approximation. Newtonian mechanics had to give way to the theory of relativity which utilized basic conceptions concerning space and time which were in many ways not consistent with those of Newtonian mechanics. The new theory was, therefore, in certain essential features qualitatively and fundamentally different from the old one." - David Bohm <<Examples of paradigm shifts: • The unification of classical physics by Newton into a coherent mechanical worldview. • The transition between the Maxwellian Electromagnetic worldview and the Einsteinian Relativistic worldview. • The transition between the worldview of Newtonian physics and the Einsteinian Relativistic worldview. >> en.wikipedia.org ... and you've shown your support for your opinion... so we can safely move on, no? Let's move on to Q theory and the role of consciousness or the observer??? Here's a radical new idea: amazon.com ... but we could start anywhere. DAK