Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : PLNI - Plasticon International, Inc. (Bulls Board) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrm_bcnu who wrote (5174)	5/29/2006 8:32:36 AM
From: iwannaride0	Respond to of 8122

Your right RRM! I can give them mindless drivel all day long!

To: rrm_bcnu who wrote (5174)	5/29/2006 12:19:07 PM
From: jmhollen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8122

The point was, "..go fight the fight where ever else it may be.."!!! Don't bring it here, where we don't have to put up with it. That was the purpose in my starting this Board, and having donpat run it. John :-) .

To: rrm_bcnu who wrote (5174)	5/29/2006 12:26:00 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8122

OT Have to admire the way you stand up to cowardly attacks and wish to thank you for your work which helps in keeping these message boards free from intimidation and attempted manipulation therefrom. Keep in mind that 1. The oft-cited "hero" of the crew is someone who has a rather checkered history, to say the least, from contempt and ridicule in civil action to NASD sanction and requirement of "non-association." How often do you see that? And this is someone who tries to call others out?? ROFLMAO 2. The other board has 35 BM's. (That's not Bowel Movements btw.) That's a small fraction of this board and many of those bookmarks are some of us here and not their targeted audience of prospective purchasers of stock. The punch may be cowardly and offensive, but it is not effective. "The bark is worse than the bite," is appropriate. Another one is that diarrhea of the keyboard leads to very few choice nuggets. 3. Keep in mind that I see a need for negative comment and questions. I have them myself and enjoy reading many boards with objective comment, not just "to the moon tomorrow" stuff. However the approach of these hypocritical self-appointed messiahs is such that they do their own campaign a disservice. I suspect that there are many who ignore that board, who otherwise might listen to a polite "basher's" serious questions. It's just common sense. If they really want to "save" others, they should reassess their allegiance and quoting of someone with a questionable history that rivals or exceeds perhaps the CEO's or insiders that they accuse. Attempts to intimidate often hide an impotence and, in this case, an admitted psychological profile that is very troubled, even though there was a comical attempt to blame (and obtain damages for) this profile on others in recent court filings, in which there was a finding of contempt, an appropriate term in many ways in this case. If you don't stand for something... you'll fall for anything.