SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: anyer who wrote (65068)5/29/2006 10:13:02 AM
From: ChanceIs  Respond to of 206290
 
>>>The market will decide unless the government rams something down our throats.<<<

OT - Backdating Stock Options.

I am spending a little time reviewing the broader news - to wit the stock option backdating scandal. I found this worthwhile snip regarding congressional interference and unintended consequences from a WSJ editorial:
__________________________________________________

Which brings us to Congress, the villain of this tale that the rest of the press corps wants to ignore. Executive greed is an easier story to sell, we suppose. But the same Members of Congress who most deplore big CEO paydays are the same ones who created the incentive for companies to overuse options as compensation.

In 1993, amid another wave of envy over CEO pay, Congress capped the tax deductibility of salaries at $1 million. To no one's surprise except apparently the Members who passed this law, most CEO salaries have since had a way of staying just below $1 million year after year. But because companies still need to compete for and retain top talent, they have found other forms of compensation -- notably stock options.

And one of the problems with options is that they give executives every incentive to capitalize all company profits back into the stock price -- thus contributing to their own pay -- rather than paying out dividends to shareholders. As SEC Chairman Chris Cox has noted, the 1993 law deserves "pride of place in the museum of unintended consequences."

In a better world -- one in which Congress kept its nose out of wage decisions -- corporate directors could pay the salaries they wanted and wouldn't rely so much on options to motivate executives. This, in turn, would reduce the incentive for companies to stoop to such dubious pay practices as option backdating. But as long-time observers of Washington, we can say with certainty that backdating will cease as a corporate practice long before Congress admits its mistake.



To: anyer who wrote (65068)5/29/2006 12:49:39 PM
From: bigfishy  Respond to of 206290
 
Anyer, It didn't seem to me the article was bashing Prius, either. It wasn't the article I was referring to. But if, the only thing you take from the article "Prius is a winner after 32.3yrs!" wasn't meant as a derogation, then I apologise for that reference to you. I'm glad you enjoy your Lexus.