Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (289561)	5/30/2006 3:38:51 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575622

Come on man, that was a unique case only. The guy screwing Patty Hearst obviously was very good at it and thus grabbed her attention, screwed her mind as well... LOL Taro

To: Dan B. who wrote (289561)	6/5/2006 2:14:45 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575622

Re: "So you condoned giving WMD chemicals to Saddam. Yes or no???" Well, while you refuse to accept that I've correctly interpreted your opinion, the above off the wall question appears in context to imply that the terrorists attacked the WTC because we aided Saddam in his war with Iran. Of course, my comment is not off the wall. Its symptomatic of how this country interferes in the affairs of other countries. Of course, if they did the same to us, you guys would go ballistic......but because its us directing the affairs of others you are quite comfortable with that role and quite naively, see no correlation between that behind-the-scenes manipulation and 9/11. That's why neocons should not be in charge. Hey, I doubt it, but I don't see the relevance of the question, since what we did in the '80's believing we were helping to maintain some balance in the region, is quite irrelevant to the WTC attacks, no? Of course, not "no". For every action there is a consequence.......and helping Saddam was not our only interference. It was only the tip of the iceberg. BTW re. the balancing act who died and made us king? Or are you suggesting that there are indeed some links of interest between Iraq and Al Qaeda that I am unaware of? You're funny. Not very clever but funny. By the by, your reply concerning Patty Hearst revealed you didn't get the analogy at all. Patty was kidnapped and brainwashed into helping criminals. Yes, there is a correlation. You may be amazed that I'm "thinking at this level," but I'm amazed that by denying a "correlation," you show you didn't understand at all. How do you see yourself being brainwashed?