Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (187731)	5/30/2006 5:26:30 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>> The US didn't even begin supplying Israel with arms until after 1967, and it was to counterbalance the huge supplies the USSR was sending the Arabs. Why? It seems that Israel was substantially stronger. Why did not US let a parity be achieved though Russian arms sale to Arabs? >> The Arabs switched from conventional to terror wars. Why? Was it perhaps because they could not possibly match Israel in conventional military, i.e. no parity of power?