Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Err America: They Report, They Decide -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (547)	5/30/2006 7:42:16 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1513

There is no question Kerry was discharged in 1970. All his biographies say so. The fact the smearvets try to lie about this is just proof of one more ridiculous dirty trick on their part. What do the smearvets want us to think anyway? That he wasn't discharged and is still in the Navy? Or that he was dishonorably discharged after coming home one of the most decorated combat heros in the Navy? Yeah right. As if. I heard they accused Kerry of sneaking into the Pentagon and changing his record too. Just ridiculous BS, laughable crap. How about a PDF file proving you're not in the Nazi party? Cut your ridiculous lies, you lowlife.

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (547)	5/30/2006 7:54:46 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 1513

Conservative Wash Times investigation confirms Kerry honorably discharged in 1970 just like he said. The final smearvet lie bites the dust. Yet if you do a search you will find 100's is not 1000's or repetitions on rightwing websites of the bald-faced lie that Kerry was somehow not discharged honorably after being such an examplary hero in Nam. All this proves is that there are lot of bigtime liars on the far right. washingtontimes.com