Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (67529)	5/31/2006 2:05:49 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 173976

"Can you estimate how many times you've heard the phrase: We cannot win in Iraq militarily, there has to be a political solution." Is it your contention that as long as we have military operations, there can be no effective political solution? I see military, education, economic, diplomatic, and social movement all in play.

To: jttmab who wrote (67529)	6/5/2006 2:23:21 PM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 173976

You are going to presume to take me to task over sentence structure? Fine. Again, I apologize, even though you do owe me one I've not seen. Why? Because you did take me out of context, making unrecognizable what you now say you could understand with a little thought. Ok. First off, I simply disagree. Iraq was a hub of terrorism before the war, IMHO. Now...Please don't try to fix for me indeed, what isn't broken. That you think something is self contradictory in your last two quotes of me, shows that you can't understand a relatively simple sentence structure. There is nothing self contradictory there. Both serve to indicate that fighting in Iraq likely lessens terrorist attacks against us. Dan B.