Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : 10-Bagger MINIMUM Rise from July 1, 2005 until December 31, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (1439)	6/7/2006 2:26:46 PM
From: SOROS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1694

This is why LBWR should eventually make us wealthy. How a PROFITABLE small company like LBWR is escaping everyone's view is beyond me. LBWR's new IR firm also represents this one -- EXNT. Just compare LBWR with them. EXNT: "During the nine months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 our revenues from operations were $1,790 and $381,173. Gross profits from these revenues were $1,040 and $133,977, respectively. Prior to the year ending March 31, 2005 there had been no significant revenues since incorporation. For the nine months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company incurred operating expenses of $318,853 and $550,058. The decrease in operating expenses of $231,205 (42%) is attributed to a decrease in consulting fees and in the Black- Scholes option valuations related to stock options granted to consultants, and a decrease in payroll expenses from the reduction from 5 to 4 employees in our office. During the nine months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 we incurred net losses of $382,549 and $447,566 or $(0.015) and $(0.018) per share, which is primarily the result of payment of payroll expenses, consulting fees, and professional services." LBWR: "a leading Employee Screening Solutions Provider, today announced first quarter sales for 2006 of $998,513.00, up from $452,421.00 which represents a 120% increase compared to the same time a year ago. Labwire is on track for an annualized run rate of $4 million for 2006 in comparison to the $1.8 million annualized run rate from a year ago this time according to Dexter Morris, CEO of Labwire, Inc." EXNT has almost THREE times the market cap of LBWR, and I'll bet in 1 year, the financial comparisons will be like comparing dynamite to a firecracker (perhaps even a dud) -- and if you take the time, you can find not one or two comparisons like this with LBWR, but hundreds. It's like people are willing to bet on companies that have a chance (in actuality perhaps 1 in 1 million) of going from LOSING money to HUGE revenues, and they reward them with huge stock prices, but because LBWR has already broken out and achieved what only perhaps 1 in 100 (or less) of these small companies do, that dream of INSTANT riches is not there, so they pass on to the next wishful company! In truth, if they would examine LBWR closely, they would see a company that actually HAS the potential, and the odds, of becoming that giant growth story they have always hoped for in an investment. It's one that can actually be put away and have no worries (I know, SOROS, the biggest worry-wart alive saying this is funny), and instead of seeing a chart that goes up 10 times in ONE year and then slowly disappears like 99%, it will be the one that goes up ten times in 2-3 years and then goes up another 10 times every two years for decades. Not to compare LBWR to MSFT, but this is the kind of chart I want to see looking back: finance.yahoo.com It should at least go up 3-4 times initially once people realize what LBWR actually is. Unhappily, there are many investors who will not notice or even look until LBWR is on the OTC or better and $1.00+ in share price. Hopefully, that comes quicker than we realize and those people can then be the ones saying, "Where was I when it was 10 cents for all that time and already showing a profit?" I remain, SOROS