SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dougSF30 who wrote (199668)6/1/2006 6:37:20 AM
From: Dan3Respond to of 275872
 
Re: I don't see how the past 5 years contradicts the necessary-but-not-sufficient hypothesis regarding performance.

Because Intel actually took share back from AMD with low IPC / High mhz Pentium 4 chips - it wasn't until their power use got flat out ridiculous that it made any difference.

If we've learned anything over the past few years it's that mhz, combined with unchallenged extortion, sells - no matter what - with the rule proving exception being when your chip uses 200 watts off the power supply and your competitor's uses half that.

A minor performance advantage on some tasks has had no detectible effect on sales since the late 90's (when you could still tell a fast CPU based system from a slow CPU based system).



To: dougSF30 who wrote (199668)6/1/2006 6:40:44 AM
From: Dan3Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: How do you figure that? Are you taking relative marketshare into account?

I'm looking at 100+ million parts into a 200 million part market from AMD from fewer than 10,000 staff vs. Intel supplying the rest from 99,000 workers.

And I think Intel is getting really worried about the same issue since they're about to can 16,000 people - but they need to get rid of more like 60,000, and that's not an easy thing to do.

Just ask General Motors.