SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ELH1006 who wrote (30748)6/1/2006 12:42:13 AM
From: etchmeister  Respond to of 95420
 
today announced its response to investors' questions regarding option grant practices.
why so sudden? what investors (please quantify)
My guess a bunch of hedge fund / short sellers are laughing their asses off

Press Release Source: Lam Research Corporation

Lam Research Corporation Comments on Stock Option Grant Practices
Tuesday May 23, 2:51 pm ET

FREMONT, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 23, 2006--Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ:LRCX - News) today announced its response to investors' questions regarding option grant practices. Lam's policy and practice have been to grant options to the CEO after the approval of the independent board members at regularly scheduled board meetings. Grants to the other named executives are made after the approval of the Compensation Committee at its regularly scheduled meetings.

Lam Research Corporation is a major supplier of wafer fabrication equipment and services to the world's semiconductor industry. Lam's common stock trades on The NASDAQ National Market® under the symbol LRCX. Lam is a NASDAQ-100® company. The Company's World Wide Web address is lamresearch.com.



To: ELH1006 who wrote (30748)6/1/2006 9:52:43 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95420
 
I think this line says it all:

They were not acting as owner-partners seeking to maximize the value of the firm, but rather as grasping hired hands seeking to maximize their own wealth at the expense of others



To: ELH1006 who wrote (30748)6/1/2006 10:02:45 AM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95420
 
ELH, thanks for this excellent article. This bears highlighting >all of these issues pale in comparison to one simple point: Executives who engaged in backdating were not putting shareholders first. They were not acting as owner-partners seeking to maximize the value of the firm, but rather as grasping hired hands seeking to maximize their own wealth at the expense of others. At the end of the day, that's all you really need to know.