SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (168210)6/1/2006 10:33:40 AM
From: JDN  Respond to of 793552
 
I as well as most others HATE the idea of having to take military action against Iran. But, more and more its seeming thats the only way. If it happens its gonna be very difficult for us folks not only on the front but here at home. But, one has to ask the question? Would it be better to do it now, or wait till they have 20-30 nuclear weapons, missiles and other delivery systems in place. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that once they are nuclear they are gonna attempt to at least take over the middle East and perhaps the world. jdn



To: LindyBill who wrote (168210)6/1/2006 1:43:12 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793552
 
Surely Sanger knew that that's ALL we could do with Iran...talk eventually. But the world had to be convinced of that.

Many in the world thought the US would go in, "guns ablazing,"...but most thinking people knew that wasn't an option.

Many in the world thought the US would handle the problem for Europe and the rest of the world. They have short memories. The Americans have become sickened at being the world's lackey and scapegoat, and one who has sacrificed their young men and women, to say nothing of our wealth, helping to protect the rest of the world, as well as ourselves, for no thanks at all.

The world had better figure out what they are going to do with Iran....The world is much closer than the US as far as having the Iranian missiles land at their front doors.