SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (289701)6/1/2006 9:53:17 AM
From: Alighieri  Respond to of 1585411
 
Think about it. It could be Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton. 24 years of this. Can we even exist after that? <G>

I vote for Chelsey...

Al



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (289701)6/7/2006 3:26:04 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1585411
 
RE:"Bush is named by 34%, followed by Richard Nixon at 17% and Bill Clinton at 16%."

Think about it. It could be Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton. 24 years of this. Can we even exist after that? <G>


Give it a rest, McMannis. No one is buying that Bill was as bad as Bush. In fact, things were good under Clinton......real good......in fact, you got to live in West Palm Beach.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (289701)6/7/2006 4:22:53 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1585411
 
The Bush tax-cut debt-spending party is over. It ended a little earlier than they'd hoped due to the out of control gas gouging by their cronies in Texas and Saudi Arabia.

Now it's time to pay the tab. But there will be no fiscal responsibility and honesty until the current rightwing congress is sent packing.