SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (199851)6/1/2006 12:48:12 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Uh, no, Petz, it really does matter how you calculate it. :)

Take the QC case. If 65nm and the K8L provided nothing at all performance wise, DC to DC, they could still compare DC to QC and make that claim, if perf is measured right.

Basically, that slide needs a HUGE number of details filled in to be worth anything.



To: Petz who wrote (199851)6/1/2006 1:51:26 PM
From: eracerRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: No matter how you calculate it, the 2007 AMD lineup will have 40+% greater peformance per watt than the *current* Core 2 lineup.

If a 2.93GHz 80W Conroe XE is 1.25x faster than a 2.8GHz 125W FX-62 then the Conroe will have a 95% performance/watt lead over Athlon 64 FX. All of a sudden a 60% performance/watt increase doesn't sound so impressive any more.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News