SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dougSF30 who wrote (199933)6/1/2006 4:59:30 PM
From: AK2004Respond to of 275872
 
re: 2.66 GHz Conroe processor will outrun a 2.6 GHz Athlon64 FX-60 by about 20%

what happened with conroe been 40%+ faster than FX-60 @ higher frequency?



To: dougSF30 who wrote (199933)6/1/2006 5:39:53 PM
From: Dan3Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: Conroe may consume about as much power as the current Netburst generation, which tops out at more than 130 watts.

Interesting news.



To: dougSF30 who wrote (199933)6/1/2006 6:44:32 PM
From: pgerassiRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
Doug:

Here is Intel (and your) nightmare:

AMD 4x4 allows 1 HTX coprocessor on MB. For benchmarks that test:
1) Linpack, they use 1 vector coprocessor in HTX slot enabling 10-100 times the performance at 3 times the power. Result, Conroe loses big in both performance and perf/watt.
2) Video transcoding, they use a transcoding coprocessor in HTX slot enabling 10 times the frame rate for just 3 times the power. Result Conroe loses big in both performance and perf/watt.
3) SPECint_rate, they use 1 multiDSP coprocessor in HTX slot enabling 10 times the performance for twice the power. Result Conroe loses big again.
4) Simulations and games, they use 1 physics engine coprocessor in HTX slot enabling 10-100 times the performance for 3 times the power. Result, Conroe loses big time.
5) Encryption and compression, they use 1 security accelerator in the HTX slot enabling 10-100 times the performance for twice the power.
...

In short, the coprocessor chosen for the buyer's intended purpose alters the performance and perf/watt advantages towards AMD from Conroe in a way that leaves Conroe so far behind that going AMD is a no brainer.

Pete

BTW: a good tagline for this is "Buy AMD and go fast. If you bought Conroe, you are no go."