SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (168395)6/2/2006 6:52:49 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793868
 
Well, the law here in Fla. was different. It did require both. Turns out the judges decision only relates to that district but the ACLU is threatening to sue if other districts dont comply. jdn



To: Ilaine who wrote (168395)6/2/2006 7:48:41 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793868
 
Random thought on the way home: the Senate claims their bill doesn't amount to amnesty since they require the current illegals to pay a fine. But wouldn't this be imposing a penalty retroactively? Isn't this a legal no-no?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News