SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (62645)6/3/2006 9:12:53 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 110194
 
Sounds cheerful and OK. But at some point one wants to stop being a Scrooge McDuck and either enjoy or give away the value to those who need it.

I guess my big lesson was at the end of the last big boom in gold and silver, when you could buy U. S. bonds paying 12%, and someone I know said meditatively, "That's a pretty good return."

Did I listen? No. I thought precious metals were good to eternity. I was terribly wrong and the guy getting 12% was terribly right. I lost half my net worth holding on and on to gold and silver.

So there does come a time to rejoin the entrepeneurial human race and buy either stocks or bonds that pay a return or represent ownership in an enterprise.

Gold is sterile.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (62645)6/4/2006 9:04:31 AM
From: re3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
may i ask what your approximate % allocation to physical + paper gold would be ?

and, i'll just assume or guess that the answer might be somewhere in the high single digits...

and if this is the case, then everything else is 90 % or more...

if all of the above is a close enough estimate, then i'd be curious as to why it wouldn't be single digits for everything else and 90 % + for gold ?