Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sylvester80 who wrote (188292)	6/4/2006 9:09:51 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

No Hawk. I've offered many alternatives. Just not any that your ilk (greedy oil thirsty rightwingers) agrees with or is willing to espouse. I suggest you read this and read it very carefully: Yeah.. all well and good that you've gone "eco-friendly".. But exactly how would that have prevented 9/11, or future terrorist attacks against our country? We can't even control the illegal immigration in this country, let alone prevent terrorists from finding their way in (look at the arrests in Canada where 17 militants were arrested with 3 TONS of Ammonium Nitrate, an amount FAR in excess of what was used in OK City). People in other nations are STILL going to purchase oil and finance these totalitarian regimes. And unfortunately, our economy is linked to theirs? And your hybrids are STILL using gasoline.. and you won't let US oil companies explore for oil in the US.. Yeah.. some solution.. But I guess that doesn't matter to you.. Because you like these dictators and megalo-maniacs. Hawk