SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim S who wrote (48815)6/5/2006 6:54:06 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 90947
 
Sadly, they were denominated in large amounts, making it almost impossible for an average guy like me to be able to buy them.

I tried to buy bonds once and ran in to the same problem. They where bonds that could be converted in to stock. I think I needed something like $70k or more to buy any.



To: Jim S who wrote (48815)6/5/2006 8:48:45 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
By using a lot of "I thinks" and "as I remembers," I can make YOU do the research!! <GGG>
YOU'RE DEAD! Watch for guys with suspicious bulges under their suit coats! :-)

One thing I do remember, though, for sure, no doubt about it, and without equivocation, is that NYC bonds were rated as junk, and were paying very high rates. This was in Carter's time when interest rates in general were soaring, and the NYC bonds were paying in excess of 20%.
So? Fed bonds, a lot safer, topped at 15%.

Besides, back then (and now) I didn't like NYC and kinda hoped they'd just go away. <G>
Look, we ALL wished NYC would sink! It would have been a lot cheaper than keeping them afloat!

And think how many fewer load mouthed jerks the US would have now had that happened!