Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Metacomet who wrote (7003)	6/6/2006 5:21:20 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218043

Meta, it's silly to redefine words to mean something they don't, and then claim to have pointed out how the original idea is a bad thing. < even here we are sufficiently civilized to recognize that Libertarian is new speak for anarchy and that is even worse than what we have.> Libertarians do not think anarchy is a good thing. Perhaps you should get a dictionary or read a link. Here's one libertarianz.org.nz I doubt you'll find much enthusiasm for anarchy. Then again, maybe you have your own definition of anarchy too. So, no, Libertarians are not in favour of anarchy, theft, murder, carnage and dissolute behaviour. You saying it's so doesn't make it so. Mqurice PS: I thought I'd check it myself. So I did a search for "anarchy" on the Libertarianz site and got 3 references. Here's one, which you could have a go at. It will help you develop your understanding: libertarianz.org.nz It shows you were wrong. Now, I will wait to see if you reply "Blimey, I had no idea my thoughts were so messed up and detached from reality. Thanks for correcting me Mq. I really appreciate your help." No worries. Always happy to help enlighten people. It's obvious that you are one of many who misunderstand, or they wouldn't have bothered putting in that explanatory comment about anarchy.