Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (2761)	6/7/2006 11:59:29 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224714

Coulter, Rice, Katherine Harris, all disgraces to their country. Why do I lump Rice in with the wackos? No, she isn't wacko herself, though somewhat strange, Rice is a disgrace because she ignored terrorism as a threat when she was security advisor. Never even mentioned the word. Richard Clarke said she'd never even heard of AL Qaida. Rice is simply a yes woman. Whatever Bush wants, Rice says yes and parrots it, including the most outlandish of lies running up to the war. I saw Rice tell the Europeans that Saddam's longrange WMD missiles could hit Euro capitols within hours. On trouble was, Saddam had no LR missiles, nor WMD and by then Rice knew it, from what we hear from the ex CIA experts. Similarly, when Bush ignored the 8-6-01 warning about AL Qaida attacks, so did Rice. Just a mimic and a puppet. She had no business being national security advisor in the first place. She had almost zero qualifications. She was an academic Russia expert, and in case no one told Bush, the Cold War was over. A Russian expert was not necessary. Very simply, 9-11 happened because Bush and Rice were asleep at the switch. The plain factthe rightrwing has gone to great lengths to try and disguise and cover up, even fabricating stories about CLintoin turning down Osama Bin Laden from the Sudan, a totally phony story. All to cover for Bush and Rice.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (2761)	6/7/2006 12:40:10 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224714

LOL. Had to look - typical Armpit question. It thinks Coulter is actually a man in drag because she has a too prominent adam's apple. Why it thinks Condi is a lesbian is, well, its own hang-ups and immaturity. It spends an inordinate amount of time speculating about others' sexuality. Probably deep-seated insecurity about its own. That would also explain the whole Perfect 10 thing. ;-)