SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (169089)6/8/2006 12:05:46 PM
From: Murrey Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793759
 
I didn't factor in the degree of right or "wrongness" in my response to her. What's written in the history books will be that which is remembered. Your take or my take, or Kofi's Company take will not matter. And you know that.

I used to read that other thread that (when I did read it) professed it's center of the road charter. I happened to pay particular attention to the comments she posted. Her posts seemed to me to be far enough away from the thread header policy statement that I challenged the moderator. He has since changed the wording in the header to accommodate posters such as her. Maybe the tone of her posts have changed since I quit reading that thread. I don't think so.

Her presence on this thread was to troll, regardless of what color of eyeglass you're looking though. And you know that, too.



To: Ilaine who wrote (169089)6/8/2006 3:33:10 PM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793759
 
Bush may push the envelope, but I'd challenge anyone to come up with outright illegalities on his or his administration's part.

And people seem to forget that SH regularly had his men aim and fire missiles on American jets doing fly overs.

Wasn't U.N. Article 51 sited as one reason for the invasion?

So far all I've heard is a whole bunch of whiners complaining about this administration doing this or that nasty bad thing, but I don't know of any law suits. Do you?