Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (188844)	6/8/2006 2:13:33 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

you are just 6 million folks on 1% of the land. Huh? Do you mean they? I don't think the percentage is important when all the neighbors agree it's not their land. Of course i dont support israel as 51st state. All i was saying was that jacob's ideal was less dumb than yours. I would say the situation since 1947 which has produced untold fighting, misery, wars and has zero long term resolution in sight is the dumbest of all three choices. The neighboring states are probably (as far as I can tell) NEVER going to accept the existence of Israel. So you have endless war, or have to come up with some other solution. My solution allows Israelis who want to live a peaceful free life do so in the US, and lets Israelis who want to fight for land surrounded by Muslim Arabs that dislike them fight their fight on their own. It removes the primary reason why Arabs dislike the USA. I don't see what's so dumb about letting other people fight their fights (the Israelis that need their "ancestral homeland" and the Arabs that need the same "ancestral homeland", and keeping Americans uninvolved.