Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rambi who wrote (169137)	6/8/2006 8:27:56 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793790

I think we all agree that the coalition allies didn't have a U.N. resolution or "permission" to invade Iraq. And there is no "may" about it.........the coalition of the willing interpreted resolution 1441 and particularly these three words..........."…all necessary means…" as serious and took it to heart. I guess I sense a tinge of regret in your final comment and I think I was right when I further read that you believe the U.S. and the coalition was "disingenuous" in making that decision. I also believe this is the major division between those of us that do support the war and those of us that don't. Sorry if I misinterpreted your meaning. We may have "interpreted" 1441 as you describe, but we knew darn well that we did not have the SC's "permission" for invasion in any way. We chose to do it regardless.</bi>