Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (188872)	6/8/2006 4:24:37 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Actually it would make things worse for the arabs as it removes their claim to victimhood and eliminates a convenient scapegoat to blame all their misfortune on.

To: steve harris who wrote (188872)	6/8/2006 4:25:26 PM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 281500

I would propose removing Israel would not improve anything in the middle east.... Well it would obviously improve the situation for the 6 million Palestinians. It would also remove a major reason for poor relations between the US and other ME nations. And it would allow the present day Israelis and their descendants (assuming the relocate to the US) to live in peace. Those three are something. Keeping Israel as it is just results in another 60 years of warfare, and by then most of us on the thread are dead so won't see what comes after....