Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (169215)	6/9/2006 4:04:54 AM
From: frankw1900	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793800

It may be a specimen from a close family member (which is adequate) and not actually from him. Or it may be a specimen taken from somthing he'd used and not taken directly from him. This is very likely because various security forces got awfully close to him the last few years but couldn't actually make the snatch. If that be the case, why could the SOB not be eliminated when the original sample was taken ?

To: kumar who wrote (169215)	6/9/2006 11:36:03 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793800

You can get a sufficient DNA sample from a toothbrush or hair in a hairbrush or comb (or turban?). Don't need much, just need to be sure you got it from the right person. Family members can also give samples that you can crosscheck to make sure nobody's pulling your leg.